Back to Search Start Over

Implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients after maxillofacial reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula flap: the effect on health-related quality of life

Authors :
Johannes N. Lodders
Gustaaf J. C. van Baar
Marije R. Vergeer
Femke Jansen
Engelbert A. J. M. Schulten
Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte
Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
Tymour Forouzanfar
Frank K. J. Leusink
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Oral Pathology
Radiation Oncology
CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life
Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery
APH - Mental Health
AMS - Tissue Function & Regeneration
Epidemiology and Data Science
APH - Methodology
APH - Personalized Medicine
Maxillofacial Surgery (VUmc)
Maxillofacial Surgery (AMC + VUmc)
Clinical Psychology
Source :
Supportive Care in Cancer, 30(6), 5411-5420. Springer Verlag, Lodders, J N, van Baar, G J C, Vergeer, M R, Jansen, F, Schulten, E A J M, Lissenberg-Witte, B I, Verdonck-de Leeuw, I M, Forouzanfar, T & Leusink, F K J 2022, ' Implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients after maxillofacial reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula flap : the effect on health-related quality of life ', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 5411-5420 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06944-4
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the effect of implant-based dental rehabilitation (IDR) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients after reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula flap (FFF). Methods Eligible patients were identified by retrospectively reviewing the medical records of patients treated in Amsterdam UMC-VUmc. HRQoL data were used from OncoQuest, a hospital-based system to collect patient-reported outcome measures in routine care. Data were used of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N 35 before FFF reconstruction (T0) and after completing IDR (T1). Data were statistically analysed with the chi-square test, independent samples t test and linear mixed models. Results Out of 96 patients with maxillofacial FFF reconstruction between January 2006 and October 2017, 57 patients (19 with and 38 without IDR) had HRQoL data at T0 and T1. In the cross-sectional analysis, patients with IDR scored significantly better at T0 and T1 on several EORTC domains compared to the patients without IDR. Weight loss was significantly different in the within-subject analysis between T0 and T1 for patients with IDR (p = 0.011). However, there were no significant differences in the mean changes of all the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 scores between the defined timepoints for patients with IDR compared to those without. Conclusions In this study, no differences were found in the course of HRQoL in HNC patients who had undergone IDR after maxillofacial FFF reconstruction, compared to those who had not. Patients should be preoperatively informed to have realistic expectations regarding the outcome of IDR.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09414355
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Supportive Care in Cancer, 30(6), 5411-5420. Springer Verlag, Lodders, J N, van Baar, G J C, Vergeer, M R, Jansen, F, Schulten, E A J M, Lissenberg-Witte, B I, Verdonck-de Leeuw, I M, Forouzanfar, T & Leusink, F K J 2022, ' Implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients after maxillofacial reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula flap : the effect on health-related quality of life ', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 5411-5420 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06944-4
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a3addf1563e4a5e6872a470842295926
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06944-4