Back to Search Start Over

Tunnel Convergence Rate in Combined Anteromedial Portal Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Structure Reconstructions Is Influenced by Anterior Cruciate Ligament Knee Flexion Angle, Tunnel Position, and Direction

Authors :
Mirco Herbort
Andre Frank
Johannes Glasbrenner
Christoph Kittl
Michael J. Raschke
Michael Wagner
Andreas Weiler
Lukas Schwietering
Source :
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopicrelated surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 38(3)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

PURPOSE The goal of the present study was to evaluate a potential tunnel convergence in combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). METHODS Ten fresh frozen femora were dissected and a K-wires were inserted into the middle of the ACL stump, according to an ACL reconstruction at 110° and 140° knee flexion. ACL reconstruction at 120° and 130° was simulated. Seven K-wires with different femoral insertion sites and angulations were drilled into the lateral femoral condyle relative to the lateral epicondyle (E3: 8 mm proximal and 4 mm posterior; E1: 5 mm proximal and 5 mm anterior and E2: over-the-top position). Tunnel conflict rate was evaluated using a measuring arm and a metrology software. RESULTS Drilling the femoral ACL tunnel in low knee flexion (110°-120°) significantly (P < .001) reduced the tunnel conflict rate compared to the ACL drilled in high knee flexion (130°-140°). Changing the insertion point from proximal and posterior (E3) to proximal and anterior (E1) showed a reduced tunnel conflict rate from 40 ± 21.2% to 15 ± 26% and no tunnel conflict for an ACL drilled at 110°-130° knee flexion. CONCLUSION A possible tunnel conflict in simultaneous ACL reconstruction using the AMP technique and LET was dependent on ACL knee flexion angle, LET insertion site, and angulation. This posed the dilemma that no generally applicable LET configuration could be recommended to avoid a tunnel conflict. However, it appears that an insertion point located proximal and anterior to the lateral epicondyle results in less tunnel conflicts than an insertion point located proximal and posterior. CLINICAL RELEVANCE An insertion point located proximal and anterior to the lateral epicondyle with a 30° proximal and 30° anterior angulation could reliably avoid a tunnel conflict when the ACL was drilled between 110 and 130° using a low anteromedial portal.

Details

ISSN :
15263231
Volume :
38
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopicrelated surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a3a36989109cc1fb76cabcd102f3b7df