Back to Search Start Over

Do clinicians prescribe exercise similarly in patients with different cardiovascular diseases? Findings from the EAPC EXPERT working group survey

Authors :
Ines Frederix
Jean-Paul Schmid
Marie-Christine Iliou
Patrick Doherty
Dominique Hansen
Sally Hinton
Paul Dendale
Gustavo Rovelo Ruiz
Marco Ambrosetti
Karin Coninx
Esteban Garcia-Porrero
Matthias Wilhelm
Tom Vromen
Ana Abreu
HANSEN, Dominique
ROVELO RUIZ, Gustavo
Doherty, Patrick
Iliou, Marie-Christine
Vromen, Tom
Hinton, Sally
FREDERIX, Ines
Wilhelm, Matthias
Schmid, Jean-Paul
Abreu, Ana
Ambrosetti, Marco
Garcia-Porrero, Esteban
CONINX, Karin
DENDALE, Paul
APH - Methodology
APH - Aging & Later Life
Graduate School
EAPC EXPERT Working Grp
Source :
European journal of preventive cardiology, 25(7), 682-691. SAGE Publications Ltd, European journal of preventive cardiology
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2018.

Abstract

Background Although disease-specific exercise guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are widely available, it remains uncertain whether these different exercise guidelines are integrated properly for patients with different CVDs. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-clinician variance in exercise prescription for patients with various CVDs and to compare these prescriptions with recommendations from the EXercise Prescription in Everyday practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool, a digital decision support system for integrated state-of-the-art exercise prescription in CVD. Design The study was a prospective observational survey. Methods Fifty-three CV rehabilitation clinicians from nine European countries were asked to prescribe exercise intensity (based on percentage of peak heart rate (HRpeak)), frequency, session duration, programme duration and exercise type (endurance or strength training) for the same five patients. Exercise prescriptions were compared between clinicians, and relationships with clinician characteristics were studied. In addition, these exercise prescriptions were compared with recommendations from the EXPERT tool. Results A large inter-clinician variance was found for prescribed exercise intensity (median (interquartile range (IQR)): 83 (13) % of HRpeak), frequency (median (IQR): 4 (2) days/week), session duration (median (IQR): 45 (18) min/session), programme duration (median (IQR): 12 (18) weeks), total exercise volume (median (IQR): 1215 (1961) peak-effort training hours) and prescription of strength training exercises (prescribed in 78% of all cases). Moreover, clinicians’ exercise prescriptions were significantly different from those of the EXPERT tool ( p Conclusions This study reveals significant inter-clinician variance in exercise prescription for patients with different CVDs and disagreement with an integrated state-of-the-art system for exercise prescription, justifying the need for standardization efforts regarding integrated exercise prescription in CV rehabilitation.

Details

ISSN :
20474881 and 20474873
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a22af5fb120ff667d1bbe38c0926864a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318760888