Back to Search
Start Over
Quantification of Mitral Valve Regurgitation from 4D Flow MRI Using Semiautomated Flow Tracking
- Source :
- Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging, Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, 2(5):e200004, Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, 2(5):e200004. Radiological Society of North America Inc.
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), 2020.
-
Abstract
- PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of semiautomated flow tracking with that of semiautomated valve tracking in the quantification of mitral valve (MV) regurgitation from clinical four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI data obtained in patients with mild, moderate, or severe MV regurgitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 4D flow MRI data were retrospectively collected from 30 patients (21 men; mean age, 61 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) who underwent 4D flow MRI from 2006 to 2016. Ten patients had mild MV regurgitation, nine had moderate MV regurgitation, and 11 had severe MV regurgitation, as diagnosed by using semiquantitative echocardiography. The regurgitant volume (Rvol) across the MV was obtained using three methods: indirect quantification of Rvol (Rvol(INDIRECT)), semiautomated quantification of Rvol using valve tracking (Rvol(VALVE)), and semiautomated quantification of Rvol using flow tracking (Rvol(FLOW)). A second observer repeated the measurements. Aortic valve flow was quantified as well to test for intervalve consistency. The Wilcoxon signed rank test, orthogonal regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and coefficients of variation were used to assess agreement among measurements and between observers. RESULTS: Rvol(FLOW) was higher (median, 24.8 mL; interquartile range [IQR], 14.3–45.7 mL) than Rvol(VALVE) (median, 9.9 mL; IQR, 6.0–16.9 mL; P < .001). Both Rvol(FLOW) and Rvol(VALVE) differed significantly from Rvol(INDIRECT) (median, 19.1 mL; IQR, 4.1–47.5 mL; P = .03). Rvol(FLOW) agreed more with Rvol(INDIRECT) (ŷ = 0.78x + 12, r = 0.88) than with Rvol(VALVE) (ŷ = 0.16x + 8.1, r = 0.53). Bland-Altman analysis revealed underestimation of Rvol(VALVE) in severe MV regurgitation. Interobserver agreement was excellent for Rvol(FLOW) (r = 0.95, coefficient of variation = 27%) and moderate for Rvol(VALVE) (r = 0.72, coefficient of variation = 57%). Orthogonal regression demonstrated better intervalve consistency for flow tracking (ŷ = 1.2x − 13.4, r = 0.82) than for valve tracking (ŷ = 2.7x − 92.4, r = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Flow tracking enables more accurate 4D flow MRI–derived MV regurgitation quantification than valve tracking in terms of agreement with indirect quantification and intervalve consistency, particularly in severe MV regurgitation. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry
Regurgitant volume
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Tracking (particle physics)
medicine.disease
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Flow (mathematics)
Internal medicine
medicine
Cardiology
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
In patient
business
Mitral valve regurgitation
Original Research
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 26386135
- Volume :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a213a3aea04c5f3ee669f1024f348e98
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200004