Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluating theories of drought-induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel-experiment framework
- Source :
- New Phytologist, New Phytologist, Wiley, 2013, 200, (Tansley review) (2), pp.304-321. ⟨10.1111/nph.12465⟩, The New phytologist, vol 200, iss 2
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- 'Summary' 305 I. 'Background' 305 II. 'Model–experiment approach' 306 III. 'Simulations of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation' 310 IV. 'On thresholds vs duration of stress as drivers of mortality' 311 V. 'Interdependence of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation' 314 VI. 'Next-generation, traditional, and empirical models' 316 VII. 'A path forward' 317 VIII. 'Conclusions' 318 'Acknowledgements' 318 References 318 Summary Model–data comparisons of plant physiological processes provide an understanding of mechanisms underlying vegetation responses to climate. We simulated the physiology of a pinon pine–juniper woodland (Pinus edulis–Juniperus monosperma) that experienced mortality during a 5 yr precipitation-reduction experiment, allowing a framework with which to examine our knowledge of drought-induced tree mortality. We used six models designed for scales ranging from individual plants to a global level, all containing state-of-the-art representations of the internal hydraulic and carbohydrate dynamics of woody plants. Despite the large range of model structures, tuning, and parameterization employed, all simulations predicted hydraulic failure and carbon starvation processes co-occurring in dying trees of both species, with the time spent with severe hydraulic failure and carbon starvation, rather than absolute thresholds per se, being a better predictor of impending mortality. Model and empirical data suggest that limited carbon and water exchanges at stomatal, phloem, and below-ground interfaces were associated with mortality of both species. The model–data comparison suggests that the introduction of a mechanistic process into physiology-based models provides equal or improved predictive power over traditional process-model or empirical thresholds. Both biophysical and empirical modeling approaches are useful in understanding processes, particularly when the models fail, because they reveal mechanisms that are likely to underlie mortality. We suggest that for some ecosystems, integration of mechanistic pathogen models into current vegetation models, and evaluation against observations, could result in a breakthrough capability to simulate vegetation dynamics.
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Physiology
Rain
Plant Science
Woodland
01 natural sciences
Trees
Hydraulic conductivity
Models
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
2. Zero hunger
Ecology
dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs)
Temperature
die-off
Vegetation
Biological Sciences
Droughts
hydraulic failure
Woody plant
Physiological
carbon starvation
Plant Biology & Botany
Climate change
Phloem
Stress
Models, Biological
cavitation
Stress, Physiological
[SDV.BV]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal Biology
Ecosystem
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
photosynthesis
Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Simulation modeling
Water
Global change
Plant Transpiration
15. Life on land
Biological
Pinus
Carbon
process-based models
Climate Action
13. Climate action
Juniperus
Plant Stomata
dynamic global vegetation models
Environmental science
010606 plant biology & botany
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14698137 and 0028646X
- Volume :
- 200
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The New phytologistReferences
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a0fa7fe79a0e5c69ebe8cc9428d32484
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12465⟩