Back to Search Start Over

Mapping of serological testing and SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies performed in 20 European countries, March-June 2020

Authors :
Laura Bubba
Peter Simmonds
Thea K Fischer
Heli Harvala
Lukas Weseslindtner
Elisabeth Spuchhammer-Stockl
Reynders Marijke
Amela Dedeic Ljubovic
Dora Aleksandrova
Irena Tabain
Petra Rainetova
Helena Jirincova
Didi Bang
Helmut Fickenscher
Andi Krumbholz
Marcus Panning
Daniela Huzly
Anna M Eis-Hübinger
Anna Papa
George Sourvinos
Alexandros Zafiropoulos
Asgeir Erlendur Ásgeirsson
Jeff Connell
Elena Percivalle
Irene Cassaniti
Couderé Karen
Andreas Lind
Svein Arne Nordbo
Maria de Sao Jose Nascimento
Joao Rodrigo Mesquita
Maria Brito
Raquel Guiomar
Ana Paula Rodrigues
Daniela Fonseca e Silva
Ana Abreu
Paulo Dessa
Corneliu Petru Popescu
Natasa Berginc
Katarina ProsencTrilar
Mario Poljak
Nuria Rabella
Juliana Esperalba
Mayte Perez-Olmeda
Aurora Fernández-García
Gordana Bogdanovic
Sandra Muschiol
Claus Bohn Christiansen
Rabia Can Sarınoglu
Aysegul Karahasan Yagci
Aysin Zeytinoglu
Mehmet Soylu
Burcin Sener
Alpaslan Alp
Source :
Journal of Global Health
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
International Global Health Society, 2021.

Abstract

Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic spread across Europe from February 2020. While robust SARS-CoV-2 serological assays were quickly developed, only limited information on applied serological testing is available. We describe the extent and nature of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing used in Europe and assess the links between epidemiology, mitigation strategies applied and seroprevalence. Methods An online questionnaire on SARS-CoV-2 serology was sent to the European Society of Clinical Virology and European Non-Polio Enterovirus Network members in September 2020. Data were analysed by comparing mitigation approaches, serological methods and seroprevalance studies performed. Results About 100 000 laboratory confirmed cases identified between March and June 2020 were reported by 36 participating laboratories from 20 countries. All responders experienced mitigation strategies including lockdowns and other closures. All except one participant had introduced serological testing; most had validated their assays (n = 29), but some had had difficulties in obtaining reference material. Most used commercial assays (n = 35), measuring IgG response against the spike antigen. Serology was used primarily for diagnostic purposes (n = 22) but also for convalescent plasma (n = 13) and research studies (n = 30). Seroprevalence studies targeted mainly health care workers (n = 20; seroprevalance 5% to 22%) and general population (n = 16; seroprevalance 0.88% to 5.6%). Basic demographic and clinical information were collected by most laboratories (n = 28), whereas data on long-term outcomes were rarely collected. Conclusions This is first study gathering systematic information on serological testing approaches implemented during the first pandemic wave in Europe.

Details

ISSN :
20472986 and 20472978
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Global Health
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a0baab9ce0d8c42da391f40c81cad579