Back to Search Start Over

Association of homogeneous inflamed gene signature with a better outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic

Authors :
Jamila Louahed
Silvija Jarnjak
Frederic Lehmann
Florent Grange
Bart Neyns
Fernando Ulloa-Montoya
Marc Gillet
Caroline Robert
Jean-François Baurain
Pedro Miguel De Sousa Alves
Céleste Lebbé
Laurent Mortier
Clinical sciences
Medical Oncology
Laboratory of Molecular and Medical Oncology
Laboratory of Molecullar and Cellular Therapy
Source :
ESMO Open
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2018.

Abstract

Purpose This study assessed clinical activity, safety and immunogenicity of MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic in patients with MAGE-A3-positive metastatic melanoma. Patients and methods In this open-label, multicentre, uncontrolled, Phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00896480),patients received ≤24 doses of MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic (4-cycle schedule). At screening, two skin lesions were biopsied for MAGE-A3 expression analysis and presence/absence of a previously identified gene signature (GS) associated with favourable clinical outcome. Clinical activity was assessed in terms of clinical response, time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and progression-free survival (PFS). Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded. MAGE-A3-specific immune responses were assessed. Clinical activity and immunogenicity were analysed overall and separately in patients with 2/2 (GS+/+), 1/2 (GS+/-) or 0/2 (GS-/-) biopsies presenting GS. Results Of 49 screened patients, 32 had MAGE-A3-positive tumours; 24 (8 GS+/+, 8 GS+/-, 8 GS-/-) were treated. Two complete (GS+/+ patients) and two partial responses (one GS+/+, one GS+/-) were reported; of note, one of the two complete responses was unlikely to be related to the study treatment. Median TTF and PFS were 14.8 and 7.2 months for GS+/+, 2.3 and 2.8 months for GS+/- and 2.4 and 2.9 months for GS-/- patients. Three grade 3 AEs and two SAEs unrelated to treatment were reported. All patients were seropositive for MAGE-A3 antibodies on vaccination with no differences between the different GS profiles. MAGE-A3-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell immunogenicity was detected; 12/16 (75.0%) of patients presented CD4+ T cell responses. Conclusion Treatment with MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic showed signs of clinical activity in GS+/+ patients. Treatment was well tolerated and immunogenic. No differences in immune responses according to GS status were observed. Trial registration number NCT00896480 (Results).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20597029
Volume :
3
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ESMO Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a011953574934b7b29490fc439191d9c