Back to Search Start Over

Quality of Facility-Based Maternal and Newborn Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Multicountry Cross-Sectional Study in the Who European Region Investigating Service Users’ Perspectives

Authors :
Marzia Lazzerini
Benedetta Covi
Ilaria Mariani
Zalka Drglin
Maryse Arendt
Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg
Helen Elden
Raquel Costa
Daniela Drandić
Jelena Radetić
Marina Ruxandra Otalea
Céline Miani
Serena Brigidi
Virginie Rozee
Barbara Mihevc Ponikvar
Barbara Tasch
Sigrun Kongslien
Karolina Linden
Catarina Barata
Magdalena Kurbanović
Jovana Ružičić
Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
Lara Martín Castañeda
Elise de La Rochebrochard
Anja Bohinec
Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
Mehreen Zaigham
Teresa Santos
Lisa Wandschneider
Ana Canales Viver
Amira Ćerimagić
Emma Sacks
Moise Muzigaba
Nino Berdzuli
Ornella Lincetto
Emanuelle Pessa Valente
IMAgiNE EURO Study Group
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background: Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking.Methods Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 to March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based quality measures. Findings: 21,027 women were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 49·9% (37·2%-60·7%) perceived a reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported health workers not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the number of health workers as “insufficient”. Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Findings were significantly worst among women with elective caesarean (CS) and emergency CS during labour (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes; younger women and those with operative births also had significant lower QMNC Indexes. Interpretation: Findings reveal large inequities in the QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Actions to reduce these inequities and promote high-quality, evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns are urgently needed. Trial Registration: Study registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336. Funding: The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. Declaration of Interest: None to declare. Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the coordinating centre: the IRCCS Burlo Garofolo Trieste (IRB-BURLO 05/2020 15.07.2020). The study protocol was also reviewed and approved by the ethical committees of three other countries to comply with local regulations: Portugal (Instituto de Saude Publica da Universidade do Porto, CE20159); Norway (Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics, 2020/213047) and Germany (Bielefeld University ethics committee, 2020-176).

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a0036989a8cf0e0e9b76559193ecbab3