Back to Search Start Over

Sex differences in spatial cognition in an invertebrate: the cuttlefish

Authors :
Christelle Jozet-Alves
Julien Moderan
Ludovic Dickel
Groupe Mémoire et Plasticité comportementale (GMPc)
Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN)
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)
Groupe Mémoire et Plasticité comportementale ( GMPc )
Université de Caen Normandie ( UNICAEN )
Normandie Université ( NU ) -Normandie Université ( NU )
Source :
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2008, 275 (1646), pp.2049-54. ⟨10.1098/rspb.2008.0501⟩, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2008, 275 (1646), pp.2049-54. 〈10.1098/rspb.2008.0501〉
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2008.

Abstract

Evidence of sex differences in spatial cognition have been reported in a wide range of vertebrate species. Several evolutionary hypotheses have been proposed to explain these differences. The one best supported is the range size hypothesis that links spatial ability to range size. Our study aimed to determine whether male cuttlefish ( Sepia officinalis ; cephalopod mollusc) range over a larger area than females and whether this difference is associated with a cognitive dimorphism in orientation abilities. First, we assessed the distance travelled by sexually immature and mature cuttlefish of both sexes when placed in an open field (test 1). Second, cuttlefish were trained to solve a spatial task in a T-maze, and the spatial strategy preferentially used (right/left turn or visual cues) was determined (test 2). Our results showed that sexually mature males travelled a longer distance in test 1, and were more likely to use visual cues to orient in test 2, compared with the other three groups. This paper demonstrates for the first time a cognitive dimorphism between sexes in an invertebrate. The data conform to the predictions of the range size hypothesis. Comparative studies with other invertebrate species might lead to a better understanding of the evolution of cognitive dimorphism.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09628452 and 14712954
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2008, 275 (1646), pp.2049-54. ⟨10.1098/rspb.2008.0501⟩, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2008, 275 (1646), pp.2049-54. 〈10.1098/rspb.2008.0501〉
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9fe4bd661e2e9df5842a959593bb6104
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0501⟩