Back to Search Start Over

A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder

Authors :
Anton J.L.M. van Balkom
Anneriek Risseeuw
Amber Geomini
Joran Lokkerbol
Mickaël Hiligsmann
Filip Smit
Julia M. van Voorthuijsen
Annemieke van Straten
Bea Tiemens
Clinical Psychology
APH - Mental Health
Health Services Research
RS: CAPHRI - R2 - Creating Value-Based Health Care
Epidemiology and Data Science
Psychiatry
Source :
Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2), 169-177. Taylor & Francis Ltd, Journal of Medical Economics, 22, 169-177, Lokkerbol, J, van Voorthuijsen, J M, Geomini, A, Tiemens, B, van Straten, A, Smit, F, Risseeuw, A, van Balkom, A & Hiligsmann, M 2019, ' A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder ', Journal of Medical Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 169-177 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403, Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2):0146-RT.R1/1555403, 169-177. Taylor&Francis, Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2), 169-177. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2), 169-177. Taylor and Francis Ltd., Journal of Medical Economics, 22, 2, pp. 169-177, Lokkerbol, J, van Voorthuijsen, J M, Geomini, A, Tiemens, B, van Straten, A, Smit, F, Risseeuw, A, van Balkom, A & Hiligsmann, M 2019, ' A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder ', Journal of Medical Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, 0146-RT.R1/1555403, pp. 169-177 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 200709.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Aims: The aim of this study was to elicit the preference of patients with an anxiety disorder regarding treatment modalities. Understanding patients' preferences could help optimize treatment uptake and adherence to therapeutic interventions. Materials and methods: A discrete-choice experiment was used to elicit patients' preferences with regard to four treatment characteristics: waiting time until first treatment, intensity of treatment, face-to-face vs digital treatment, and group size. In 12 choice sets, participants were asked to choose between two treatment alternatives. A random parameters logit model was used to analyse the data. Results: A total of 126 participants, aged 18 years and older, currently or in the previous year in treatment for an anxiety disorder, completed the survey. Respondents preferred short (over long) waiting times, face-to-face (over digital) treatment, individual (over group) treatment and a treatment intensity of one session per week rather than two sessions per week or one session every two weeks. Waiting time and treatment intensity were substantially less important to patients than level of digitalization and group size. Heterogeneity in preference was significant for each attribute, and sub-group analyses revealed this was partly related to education level and age. Limitations: The convenience sample over-represented the female and younger population, limiting generalizability. Limited information on background characteristics limited the possibilities to explore preference heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study demonstrated how different treatment components for anxiety disorders affect patients' preferences for those treatments. There is significant variation in treatment preferences, even after accounting for age and education. Incorporating patients' preferences into treatment decisions could potentially lead to improved adherence of treatments for anxiety disorders. 9 p.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941837X and 13696998
Volume :
22
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Medical Economics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9f44f2201f85821a3907c66f6ee199d4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403