Back to Search
Start Over
A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder
- Source :
- Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2), 169-177. Taylor & Francis Ltd, Journal of Medical Economics, 22, 169-177, Lokkerbol, J, van Voorthuijsen, J M, Geomini, A, Tiemens, B, van Straten, A, Smit, F, Risseeuw, A, van Balkom, A & Hiligsmann, M 2019, ' A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder ', Journal of Medical Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 169-177 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403, Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2):0146-RT.R1/1555403, 169-177. Taylor&Francis, Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2), 169-177. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, Journal of Medical Economics, 22(2), 169-177. Taylor and Francis Ltd., Journal of Medical Economics, 22, 2, pp. 169-177, Lokkerbol, J, van Voorthuijsen, J M, Geomini, A, Tiemens, B, van Straten, A, Smit, F, Risseeuw, A, van Balkom, A & Hiligsmann, M 2019, ' A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder ', Journal of Medical Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, 0146-RT.R1/1555403, pp. 169-177 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Contains fulltext : 200709.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Aims: The aim of this study was to elicit the preference of patients with an anxiety disorder regarding treatment modalities. Understanding patients' preferences could help optimize treatment uptake and adherence to therapeutic interventions. Materials and methods: A discrete-choice experiment was used to elicit patients' preferences with regard to four treatment characteristics: waiting time until first treatment, intensity of treatment, face-to-face vs digital treatment, and group size. In 12 choice sets, participants were asked to choose between two treatment alternatives. A random parameters logit model was used to analyse the data. Results: A total of 126 participants, aged 18 years and older, currently or in the previous year in treatment for an anxiety disorder, completed the survey. Respondents preferred short (over long) waiting times, face-to-face (over digital) treatment, individual (over group) treatment and a treatment intensity of one session per week rather than two sessions per week or one session every two weeks. Waiting time and treatment intensity were substantially less important to patients than level of digitalization and group size. Heterogeneity in preference was significant for each attribute, and sub-group analyses revealed this was partly related to education level and age. Limitations: The convenience sample over-represented the female and younger population, limiting generalizability. Limited information on background characteristics limited the possibilities to explore preference heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study demonstrated how different treatment components for anxiety disorders affect patients' preferences for those treatments. There is significant variation in treatment preferences, even after accounting for age and education. Incorporating patients' preferences into treatment decisions could potentially lead to improved adherence of treatments for anxiety disorders. 9 p.
- Subjects :
- Male
Time Factors
Psychological intervention
Anxiety
Choice Behavior
Experimental Psychopathology and Treatment
0302 clinical medicine
choice
education.field_of_study
treatment
030503 health policy & services
Health Policy
Middle Aged
DEPRESSION
Anxiety Disorders
Telemedicine
Preference
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Psychotherapy, Group
Female
medicine.symptom
0305 other medical science
SDG 4 - Quality Education
MENTAL-HEALTH
Anxiety disorder
Clinical psychology
Adult
Adolescent
Waiting Lists
Decision Making
Population
Affect (psychology)
Decision Support Techniques
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
discrete-choice experiment
medicine
Humans
Generalizability theory
education
business.industry
GLOBAL BURDEN
CARE
medicine.disease
Sample size determination
SAMPLE-SIZE
business
patient preference
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1941837X and 13696998
- Volume :
- 22
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Medical Economics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9f44f2201f85821a3907c66f6ee199d4
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403