Back to Search Start Over

Direct Delivery of Kidney Transplant Education to Black and Low-Income Patients Receiving Dialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors :
Christina J. Goalby
Leanne Peace
John D. Peipert
Amy D. Waterman
Anna Michelle M. McSorley
Jennifer L. Beaumont
Source :
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, vol 74, iss 5, Am J Kidney Dis
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
eScholarship, University of California, 2019.

Abstract

Rationale & Objective Compared with others, black and low-income patients receiving dialysis are less likely to receive kidney transplantation (KT) education within dialysis centers. We examined the efficacy of 2 supplementary KT education approaches delivered directly to patients. Study Design Prospective, 3-arm parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. Settings & Participants Adult, black, and white low-income patients receiving dialysis in Missouri. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 educational conditions: (1) standard of care, usual KT education provided in dialysis centers (control); (2) Explore Transplant @ Home patient-guided, 4 modules of KT education sent directly to patients using print, video, and text messages; and (3) Explore Transplant @ Home educator-guided, the patient-guided intervention plus 4 telephonic discussions with an educator. Outcomes Primary: patient knowledge of living (LDKT) and deceased donor KT (DDKT). Secondary: informed decision making, change in attitudes in favor of LDKT and DDKT, and change in the number of new steps taken toward KT. Results In intent-to-treat analyses, patients randomly assigned to educator- and patient-guided interventions had greater knowledge gains (1.4 point increase) than control patients (0.8 point increase; P=0.02 and P=0.01, respectively). Compared with control patients, more patients randomly assigned to educator- and patient-guided interventions were able to make informed decisions about starting KT evaluation (82% vs 91% and 95%; P=0.003), pursuing DDKT (70% vs 84% and 84%; P=0.003), and pursuing LDKT (73% vs 91% and 92%; P Limitations Potential contamination because of patient-level randomization; no assessment of clinical end points. Conclusions Education presented directly to dialysis patients, with or without coaching by telephone, increased dialysis patients' KT knowledge and informed decision making without increasing educational burden on providers. Funding Source This project was funded by the National Institutes of Health and Health Resources and Services Administration. Trial Registration Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT02268682.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, vol 74, iss 5, Am J Kidney Dis
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9ea69af5f49e36d51a850f6f7dee1350