Back to Search
Start Over
Investigation of Optimal Wavelet Techniques for De-noising of MRI Brain Abnormal Image
- Source :
- Procedia Computer Science. 85:669-675
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2016.
-
Abstract
- In the field of medical applications, typically obtained medical images like X-ray, CT, MRI etc. consists of noise that reduces the visual quality of an image. Therefore, de-noising is essential during the image acquisition process. Though several methods are available for de-noising the image, the performance metrics of wavelets and threshold values to be used are not optimized for assessing the quality of an image. In this paper, DWT techniques with suitable threshold value and five objective quality metrics are used for de-noising the abnormal MRI brain speckle noise image. Quality metrics like Squared Error Mean (SEM), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural content (SC), Structural Similarity Index Method (SSIM), and Absolute Mean Error (AME) are estimated for de-noised MRI brain image are discussed. The quality of the image is assessed depending on the metrics and wavelet threshold techniques.
- Subjects :
- MRI brain abnormal image
Computer science
020101 civil engineering
02 engineering and technology
0201 civil engineering
Image (mathematics)
Quality (physics)
Wavelet
threshold
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Structural content (SC)
Computer vision
DWT
General Environmental Science
Squared Error Mean (SEM)
business.industry
Noise (signal processing)
Absolute Mean Error (AME)
Pattern recognition
Speckle noise
Structural Similarity Index Metrics (SSIM)
Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR)
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
020201 artificial intelligence & image processing
Artificial intelligence
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 18770509
- Volume :
- 85
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Procedia Computer Science
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9e1966060a05444b1ce276463871e711
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.252