Back to Search Start Over

Comparative effects of intensive-blood pressure versus standard-blood pressure-lowering treatment in patients with severe ischemic stroke in the ENCHANTED trial

Authors :
John Chalmers
Mark Woodward
Richard I. Lindley
Alice C. Durham
Octavio M. Pontes-Neto
Lili Song
Jatinder S. Minhas
Stefano Ricci
Joseph P. Broderick
Pablo M. Lavados
Jong S. Kim
Xia Wang
Candice Delcourt
Philip M.W. Bath
Tsong-Hai Lee
Thompson G. Robinson
Craig S. Anderson
Andrew M. Demchuk
Vijay Sharma
Jiguang Wang
Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins
Source :
Journal of Hypertension. 39:280-285
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2020.

Abstract

Limited data exist on the optimum level of SBP in thrombolyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to determine the effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering, specifically in patients with severe AIS who participated in the international, Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study.Prespecificed subgroup analyzes of the BP arm of Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study, a multicenter, partial-factorial, open, blinded outcome assessed trial, in which 2227 thrombolysis-eligible and treated AIS patients with elevated SBP (150 mmHg) were randomized to intensive (target 130-140 mmHg) or guideline-recommended (180 mmHg) BP management. Severe stroke was defined by computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiogram confirmation of large-vessel occlusion, receipt of endovascular therapy, final diagnosis of large artery atheromatous disease, or high (10) baseline neurological scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The primary efficacy outcome was death or any disability (modified Rankin scale scores 2-6). The key safety outcome was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Treatment effects estimated in logistic regression models are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).There were 1311 patients [mean age 67 years; 37% female; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 11 (range 6.0-15.0)] with severe AIS. Overall, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of death or disability. However, intensive BP lowering significantly increased mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.13; P = 0.014) compared with guideline BP lowering, despite significantly lowering clinician-reported ICH (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92; P = 0.016).Intensive BP lowering is associated with increased mortality in patients with severe AIS despite lowering the risk of ICH. Further randomized trials are required to provide reliable evidence over the optimum SBP target in the most serious type of AIS.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01422616.

Details

ISSN :
14735598 and 02636352
Volume :
39
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Hypertension
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9e0eedfafa437e5be729483f01519f08
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002640