Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

Authors :
Luca Carmisciano
Vincent J. Gnanapragasam
Tristan Barrett
Anne Y. Warren
Evis Sala
Kasra Saeb-Parsy
Maria Pantelidou
Nadeem Shaida
Jeries P. Zawaideh
Iztok Caglic
Brendan Koo
Christof Kastner
Zawaideh, Jeries P [0000-0002-1304-7495]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Source :
Br J Radiol
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
British Institute of Radiology, 2020.

Abstract

Objective:To compare the performance of Likert and Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) multiparametric (mp) MRI scoring systems for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).Methods:199 biopsy-naïve males undergoing prostate mpMRI were prospectively scored with Likert and PI-RADS systems by four experienced radiologists. A binary cut-off (threshold score ≥3) was used to analyze histological results by three groups: negative, insignificant disease (Gleason 3 + 3; iPCa), and csPCa (Gleason ≥3 +4). Lesion-level results and prostate zonal location were also compared.Results:129/199 (64.8%) males underwent biopsy, 96 with Likert or PI-RADS score ≥3, and 21 with negative MRI. A further 12 patients were biopsied during follow-up (mean 507 days). Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 87/199 (43.7%) patients, 65 with (33.6%) csPCa. 30/92 (32.6%) patients with negative MRI were biopsied, with an NPV of 83.3% for cancer and 86.7% for csPCa. Likert and PI-RADS score differences were observed in 92 patients (46.2%), but only for 16 patients (8%) at threshold score ≥3. Likert scoring had higher specificity than PI-RADS (0.77 vs 0.66), higher area under the curve (0.92 vs 0.87, p = 0.002) and higher PPV (0.66 vs 0.58); NPV and sensitivity were the same. Likert had more five score results (58%) compared to PI-RADS (36%), but with similar csCPa detection (81.0 and 80.6% respectively). Likert demonstrated lower proportion of false positive in the predominately AFMS-involving lesions.Conclusion:Likert and PI-RADS systems both demonstrate high cancer detection rates. Likert scoring had a higher AUC with moderately higher specificity and lower positive call rate and could potentially help to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies performed.Advances in knowledge:This paper illustrates that the Likert scoring system has potential to help urologists reduce the number of prostate biopsies performed.

Details

ISSN :
1748880X and 00071285
Volume :
93
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The British Journal of Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9c94a10c6eeb2a58da1c74528302fb0f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200298