Back to Search Start Over

Lung-ultrasound objective structured assessment of technical skills (LUS-OSAUS): utility in the assessment of lung-ultrasound trained medical undergraduates

Authors :
Ron Ruzga
Tiziano Perrone
Stefano Perlini
Silvia Mongodi
William Brambilla
Francesco Falaschi
Maria Mascolo
Santi Di Pietro
Source :
Journal of Ultrasound
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Purpose Recently, some attempts have been made to integrate lung ultrasound (LUS) teaching into medical curricula. However, current education studies of LUS are extremely heterogeneous due to the lack of evidence-based guidelines on LUS education. In particular, the assessment of competencies is poorly standardized and mostly relies on non-validated scales. A new validated tool, the objective structured assessment of lung ultrasound skills (LUS-OSAUS), has the potential to overcome these limitations. Therefore, we adopted the LUS-OSAUS tool to assess the competencies of a group of LUS-trained undergraduates. Existing no prior practical applications of the LUS-OSAUS, our aim was to investigate the practical utility of this tool and its applicability in the evaluation of US-trained medical students. Methods Eight undergraduates (two males, six females) were enrolled on a voluntary basis to receive a theoretical and practical training in LUS. Once completed their training, each student performed an LUS examination on a different patient hospitalized for respiratory symptoms. The same eight patients were also scanned by a senior resident in emergency medicine for a comparison with students’ results. Students and the senior resident were tested by an examiner using the LUS-OSAUS tool. We compared the scores obtained by operators in all areas of competence of the LUS-OSAUS, the total scores, and the time needed to complete the sonographic task. Results Median students’ score in the single items of the scale was significantly lower than the ones obtained by the senior resident (4.0 [3.3–5.0] vs. 5.0 [5.0–5.0]; p

Details

ISSN :
18767931
Volume :
24
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Ultrasound
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9c83c189efc3743ec35b110d075ce71b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00454-x