Back to Search Start Over

Intragenic Enhancers Act as Alternative Promoters

Authors :
Monika S. Kowalczyk
Douglas Vernimmen
Richard J. Gibbons
Mona Hosseini
David Garrick
Jim R. Hughes
Jacqueline A. Sloane-Stanley
Douglas R. Higgs
Marco De Gobbi
Jacqueline A. Sharpe
William G. Wood
Nicola Gray
Jill M. Brown
Magnus D. Lynch
Licio Collavin
Simon J. McGowan
Thomas A. Milne
Veronica J. Buckle
Stephen S. Taylor
Jonathan Flint
Kowalczyk, M
Hughes, Jr
Garrick, D
Lynch, Md
Sharpe, Ja
Sloane Stanley, Ja
Mcgowan, Sj
De Gobbi, M
Hosseini, M
Vernimmen, D
Brown, Jm
Gray, Ne
Collavin, Licio
Gibbons, Rj
Flint, J
Taylor, S
Buckle, Vj
Milne, Ta
Wood, Wg
Higgs, Dr
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

A substantial amount of organismal complexity is thought to be encoded by enhancers which specify the location, timing, and levels of gene expression. In mammals there are more enhancers than promoters which are distributed both between and within genes. Here we show that activated, intragenic enhancers frequently act as alternative tissue-specific promoters producing a class of abundant, spliced, multiexonic poly(A) + RNAs (meRNAs) which reflect the host gene's structure. meRNAs make a substantial and unanticipated contribution to the complexity of the transcriptome, appearing as alternative isoforms of the host gene. The low protein-coding potential of meRNAs suggests that many meRNAs may be byproducts of enhancer activation or underlie as-yet-unidentified RNA-encoded functions. Distinguishing between meRNAs and mRNAs will transform our interpretation of dynamic changes in transcription both at the level of individual genes and of the genome as a whole. © 2012 Elsevier Inc..

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9c3a444b7673a0d4d0a288c50a8ae9ac