Back to Search Start Over

The prognostic value of the number of positive lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio in early‐stage cervical cancer

Authors :
Ester P. Olthof
Constantijne H. Mom
Malou L. H. Snijders
Hans H. B. Wenzel
Jacobus van der Velden
Maaike A. van der Aa
Graduate School
Pathology
CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
CCA - Imaging and biomarkers
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D)
Obstetrics and gynaecology
Source :
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 101(5), 550-557. Wiley-Blackwell, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 101(5), 550-557. Wiley-Blackwell, Olthof, E P, Mom, C H, Snijders, M L H, Wenzel, H H B, van der Velden, J & van der Aa, M A 2022, ' The prognostic value of the number of positive lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio in early-stage cervical cancer ', Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 550-557 . https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14316
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

Introduction: To establish the impact of the number of lymph node metastases (nLNM) and the lymph node ratio (LNR) on survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after surgery. Material and methods: In this nationwide historical cohort study, all women diagnosed between 1995 and 2020 with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA2–IIA1 cervical cancer and nodal metastases after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were selected. Optimal cut-offs for prognostic stratification by nLNM and LNR were calculated to categorize patients into low-risk or high-risk groups. Kaplan–Meier overall survival analysis and flexible parametric relative survival analysis were used to determine the impact of nLNM and LNR on survival. Missing data were imputed. Results: The optimal cut-off point was ≥4 for nLNM and ≥0.177 for LNR. Of the 593 women included, 500 and 501 (both 84%) were categorized into the low-risk and 93 and 92 (both 16%) into the high-risk groups for nLNM and LNR, respectively. Both high-risk groups had a worse 5-year overall survival (p

Details

ISSN :
16000412 and 00016349
Volume :
101
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9c2fbe4c9e930c454da1185c0a07011d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14316