Back to Search Start Over

Infrared Counterparts to Chandra X-Ray Sources in the Antennae

Authors :
Joseph C. Carson
Thomas L. Hayward
John C. Wilson
Bernhard R. Brandl
Stephen S. Eikenberry
D. M. Clark
Charles P. Henderson
Donald J. Barry
Andy Ptak
Edward Colbert
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
arXiv, 2006.

Abstract

We use deep J and Ks images of the Antennae (NGC 4038/9) obtained with WIRC on the Palomar 200-inch telescope, together with the Chandra X-ray source list of Zezas et al. (2002a), to search for IR counterparts to X-ray point sources. We establish an X-ray/IR astrometric frame tie with 0.5" rms residuals over a \~4.3' field. We find 13 ``strong'' IR counterparts brighter than Ks = 17.8 mag and < 1.0" from X-ray sources, and an additional 6 ``possible'' IR counterparts between 1.0" and 1.5" from X-ray sources. The surface density of IR sources near the X-ray sources suggests only ~2 of the ``strong'' counterparts and ~3 of the ``possible'' counterparts are chance superpositions of unrelated objects. Comparing both strong and possible IR counterparts to our photometric study of ~220 Antennae, IR clusters, we find the IR counterparts to X-ray sources are \~1.2 mag more luminous in Ks than average non-X-ray clusters. We also note that the X-ray/IR matches are concentrated in the spiral arms and ``overlap'' regions of the Antennae. This implies that these X-ray sources lie in the most ``super'' of the Antennae's Super Star Clusters, and thus trace the recent massive star formation history here. Based on the N_H inferred from the X-ray sources without IR counterparts, we determine that the absence of most of the ``missing'' IR counterparts is because they are intrinsically less luminous in the IR, implying that they trace a different (possibly older) stellar population.<br />27 pages, 10 Poscript figures, accepted by ApJ

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9c00e2db4d8456fa1aaa318250c5e2ec
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0612169