Back to Search Start Over

Quantitative Measures Confirm the Inverse Relationship between Lesion Spiculation and Detection of Breast Masses

Authors :
Natacha Borecky
Warren Reed
Mariusz W. Pietrzyk
Mohammad Rawashdeh
Elaine A. Ryan
Warwick Lee
Patrick C. Brennan
Roger Bourne
Source :
Academic Radiology. 20:576-580
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2013.

Abstract

Objective To identify specific mammographic appearances that reduce the mammographic detection of breast cancer. Materials and Methods This study received institutional board review approval and all readers gave informed consent. A set of 60 mammograms each consisting of craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections were presented to 129 mammogram Breastscreen readers. The images consisted of 20 positive cases with single and multicentric masses in 16 and 4 cases, respectively (resulting in a total of 24 cancers), and readers were asked to identify and locate the lesions. Each lesion was then ranked according to a detectability rating (ie, the number of observers who correctly located the lesion divided by the total number of observers), and this was correlated with breast density, lesion size, and various descriptors of lesion shape and texture. Results Negative and positive correlations between lesion detection and density (r = −0.64, P = .007) and size (r = 0.65, P = .005), respectively, were demonstrated. In terms of lesion size and shape, there were significant correlations between the probability of detection and area (r = 0.43, P = .04), perimeter (r = 0.66, P = .0004), lesion elongation (r = 0.49, P = .02), and lesion nonspiculation (r = 0.78, P Conclusions The results of this study have identified specific lesion characteristics associated with shape that may contribute to reduced cancer detection. Mammographic sensitivity may be adversely affected without appropriate attention to spiculation.

Details

ISSN :
10766332
Volume :
20
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Academic Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9bbab3f4193897c351f0c9903ecff450
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.010