Back to Search
Start Over
Pharmacist conscience clauses and access to oral contraceptives
- Source :
- Journal of Medical Ethics. 34:517-520
- Publication Year :
- 2008
- Publisher :
- BMJ, 2008.
-
Abstract
- The introduction of conscience clauses after the 1973 US Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade allowed physicians and nurses to opt out of medical procedures, particularly abortions, to which they were morally opposed. In recent years pharmacists have requested the same consideration with regard to dispensing some medicines. This paper examines the pharmacists' role and their professional and moral obligations to patients in the light of recent refusals by pharmacists to dispense oral contraceptives. A review of John Rawls's concepts of the "original position" and the "veil of ignorance", along with consideration of the concept of compartmentalisation, are used to assess pharmacists' requests and the moral and legal rights of patients to have their prescriptive needs met.
- Subjects :
- Moral Obligations
Health (social science)
health care facilities, manpower, and services
media_common.quotation_subject
education
Pharmacist
Legislation
Pharmacists
Opt-out
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Humans
Medicine
health care economics and organizations
Conscience
media_common
business.industry
Health Policy
Refusal to Treat
Veil of ignorance
Continuity of Patient Care
humanities
Supreme court
Religion
Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Original position
Family planning
Pharmaceutical Services
Law
Female
business
Contraceptives, Oral
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 03066800
- Volume :
- 34
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Medical Ethics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9bb9834c6ea3a330130c8af8aa97d8ec