Back to Search Start Over

Increasing resident utilization and recognition of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study from an academic medical center

Authors :
Jordan M. Winter
Harish Lavu
Francesco Palazzo
Michael J. Pucci
Charles J. Yeo
Stephen M. Doane
Karen A. Chojnacki
Crystal B. Chen
Ernest L. Rosato
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy. 31:1627-1635
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2016.

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a commonly performed surgical procedure; however, it is associated with an increased rate of bile duct injury (BDI) when compared to the open approach. The critical view of safety (CVS) provides a secure method of ductal identification to help avoid BDI. CVS is not universally utilized by practicing surgeons and/or taught to surgical residents. We aimed to pilot a safe cholecystectomy curriculum to demonstrate that educational interventions could improve resident adherence to and recognition of the CVS during LC.Forty-three general surgery residents at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital were prospectively studied. Fifty-one consecutive LC cases were recorded during the pre-intervention period, while the residents were blinded to the outcome measured (CVS score). As an intervention, a comprehensive lecture on safe cholecystectomy was given to all residents. Fifty consecutive LC cases were recorded post-intervention, while the residents were empowered to "time-out" and document the CVS with a doublet photograph. Two independent surgeons scored the videos and photographs using a 6-point scale. Residents were surveyed pre- and post-intervention to determine objective knowledge and self-reported comfort using a 5-point Likert scale.In the 18-week study period, 101 consecutive LCs were adequately captured and included (51 pre-intervention, 50 post-intervention). Patient demographics and clinical data were similar. The mean CVS score improved from 2.3 to 4.3 (p 0.001). The number of videos with CVS score4 increased from 15.7 to 52 % (p 0.001). There was strong inter-observer agreement between reviewers. The pre- and post-intervention questionnaire response rates were 90.7 and 83.7 %, respectively. A greater number of residents correctly identified all criteria of the CVS post-intervention (41-93 %, p 0.001) and offered appropriate bailout techniques (77-94 %, p 0.001). Residents strongly agreed that the CVS education should be included in general surgery residency curriculum (mean Likert score = 4.71, SD = 0.54). Residents also agreed that they are more comfortable with their LC skills after the intervention (4.27, σ = 0.83).The combination of focused education along with intraoperative time-out significantly improved CVS scores and knowledge during LC in our institution.

Details

ISSN :
14322218 and 09302794
Volume :
31
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9bb8250c629ab4a06448591c5dd1b2b4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5150-0