Back to Search
Start Over
Accuracy of physical therapists' early predictions of upper-limb function in hospital stroke units: the EPOS Study
- Source :
- Physical Therapy, 93(4), 460-469. American Physical Therapy Association, Nijland, R H M, van Wegen, E E H, Harmeling-van Wel, B & Kwakkel, G 2013, ' Accuracy of Physical Therapists' Early Predictions of Upper-Limb Function in Hospital Stroke Units: The EPOS Study ', Physical Therapy, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 460-469 . https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120112
- Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Background Early prediction of outcome after stroke is becoming increasingly important, as most patients are discharged from hospital stroke units within several days after stroke. Objectives The primary purposes of this study were: (1) to determine the accuracy of physical therapists' predictions at hospital stroke units regarding upper-limb (UL) function, (2) to develop a computational prediction model (CPM), and (3) to compare the accuracy of physical therapists' and the CPM's predictions. Secondary objectives were to explore the impact of timing on the accuracy of the physical therapists' and CPM's predictions and to investigate the direction of the difference between predicted and observed outcomes. Finally, this study investigated whether the accuracy of physical therapists' predictions was affected by their experience in stroke rehabilitation. Design A prospective cohort study was conducted. Methods Physical therapists made predictions at 2 time points—within 72 hours after stroke onset (T72h) and at discharge from the hospital stroke unit (Tdischarge)—about UL function after 6 months in 3 categories, derived from the Action Research Arm Test. At the same time, clinical variables were measured to derive a CPM. The accuracy of the physical therapists' and CPM's predictions was evaluated by calculating Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rs) between predicted and observed outcomes. Results One hundred thirty-one patients and 20 physical therapists participated in the study. For the T72h assessment, the rs value between predicted and observed outcomes was .63 for the physical therapists' predictions and .75 for the CPM's predictions. For the Tdischarge assessment, the rs value for the physical therapists' predictions improved to .75, and the rs value for the CPM's predictions improved slightly to .76. Limitations Physical therapists administered a test battery every 3 days, which may have enhanced the accuracy of prediction. Conclusions The accuracy of the physical therapists' predictions at T72h was lower than that of the CPM's predictions. At Tdischarge, the physical therapists' and CPM's predictions are about equally accurate.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Cohort Studies
Upper Extremity
Physical medicine and rehabilitation
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Early prediction
medicine
Humans
Computer Simulation
Prospective Studies
In hospital stroke
Prospective cohort study
Stroke
Aged
Netherlands
Rehabilitation
business.industry
Stroke Rehabilitation
Recovery of Function
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Prognosis
Test (assessment)
Physical Therapists
medicine.anatomical_structure
Physical therapy
Upper limb
Female
business
human activities
Hospital Units
Cohort study
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15386724 and 00319023
- Volume :
- 93
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Physical therapy
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9b98b7037ba2b279eea3140ce3e0d425
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120112