Back to Search
Start Over
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) in Elderly Patients: Which Drug to Choose, Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Source :
- Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, Vol 8, Iss 123, p 123 (2021), Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- MDPI AG, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Background: A new generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (ticagrelor) is recommended in current therapeutic guidelines to treat patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, it is unknown if ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in elderly patients. Therefore, a systematic review was done to assess the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in older patients with CHD to determine the appropriate antiplatelet treatment plan. Methodology: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in elderly patients with CHD. We selected eligible RCTs based on specified study criteria following a systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2007 to May 2021. Primary efficacy outcomes assessed were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), and all-cause death. The secondary outcome assessed was major bleeding events. We used RevMan 5.3 software to conduct a random-effects meta-analysis and estimated the pooled incidence and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Results: Data from 6 RCTs comprising 21,827 elderly patients were extracted according to the eligibility criteria. There was no significant difference in the MACE outcome (incidence: 9.23% vs. 10.57%; RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.70–1.28, p = 0.72), MI (incidence: 5.40% vs. 6.23%; RR = 0.94, 95% CI= 0.69–1.27, p = 0.67), ST (incidence: 2.33% vs. 3.17%; RR = 0.61, 95% CI= 0.32–1.17, p = 0.13), and all-cause death (4.29% vs. 5.33%; RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.65–1.12, p = 0.25) for ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel, respectively. In addition, ticagrelor was not associated with a significant increase in the rate of major bleeding (incidence: 9.98% vs. 9.33%: RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.97–1.94, p = 0.07) vs. clopidogrel. Conclusions: This study did not find evidence that ticagrelor is significantly more effective or safer than clopidogrel in elderly patients with CHD.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
law.invention
ticagrelor
P2Y12
Randomized controlled trial
systematic review
law
Internal medicine
medicine
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
Pharmacology (medical)
Myocardial infarction
cardiovascular diseases
General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
clopidogrel
business.industry
Clopidogrel
medicine.disease
meta-analysis
Meta-analysis
Relative risk
RC666-701
randomized controlled trials
business
Ticagrelor
Mace
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 23083425
- Volume :
- 8
- Issue :
- 123
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9b7806ab84d9acedcc33f46e782a61e0