Back to Search Start Over

Management of complex ventral hernias: results of an international survey

Authors :
Nicholas J. Slater
Camiel Rosman
L. Knaapen
B Matthews
Harry van Goor
O.R. Buyne
Source :
BJS Open, 5, BJS Open, 5, 1, BJS Open
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background The surgical treatment of patients with complex ventral hernias is challenging. The aim of this study was to present an international overview of expert opinions on current practice. Methods A survey questionnaire was designed to investigate preoperative risk management, surgical approach and mesh choice in patients undergoing complex hernias repair, and treatment strategies for infected meshes. Geographical location of practice, experience and annual volumes of the surgeons were compared. Results Of 408 surgeons, 234 (57.4 per cent) were practising in the USA, 116 (28.4 per cent) in Europe, and 58 (14.2 per cent) in other countries. Some 412 of 418 surgeons (98.6 per cent) performed open repair and 322 of 416 (77.4 per cent) performed laparoscopic repair. Most recommended preoperative work-up/lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation (319 of 398, 80.2 per cent) and weight loss (254 of 399, 63.7 per cent), but the consequences of these strategies varied. American surgeons and less experienced surgeons were stricter. Antibiotics were given at least 1 h before surgery by 295 of 414 respondents (71.3 per cent). Synthetic and biological meshes were used equally in contaminated primary hernia repair, whereas for recurrent hernia repair synthetic mesh was used in a clean environment and biological or no mesh in a contaminated environment. American surgeons and surgeons with less experience preferred biological mesh in contaminated environments significantly more often. Percutaneous drainage and antibiotics were the first steps recommended in treating mesh infection. In the presence of sepsis, most surgeons favoured synthetic mesh explantation and further repair with biological mesh. Conclusion There remains a paucity of good-quality evidence in dealing with these hernias, leading to variations in management. Patient optimization and issues related to mesh choice and infections require well designed prospective studies.<br />This manuscript displays a good overview of current practice among difficult subjects in ventral hernia repair on which limited guidelines exist in two continents (Europe and USA). Based on our findings we would recommend that more attention should be paid on pre-operative optimization and specifically pre-operative diabetic control and adequate administration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Prehabilitation programs should be implemented together with patient education on the importance of risk reduction and the impact of complications. Reaching goals set to optimize patients before hernia surgery should be a quality control parameter. The use of biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair should be critically appraised. To improve adherence to guidelines and protocol decision tools, guideline training, easy ways of data sharing, feedback loops and apps may be helpful. Since there is a gap in knowledge concerning mesh infection (abscess) a standardized animal model needs to be developed to assess different treatment options and analyze different meshes for their susceptibility to infection and the ability to clear an infection. Lack of high quality evidence This survey provided a good overview of current practice among difficult subjects in ventral hernia repair on which limited guidelines exist in two continents (Europe and USA). Based on the findings, the authors recommend that more attention should be paid to preoperative optimization, specifically preoperative diabetic control and adequate antibiotic prophylaxis. Prehabilitation programmes should be implemented together with patient education on the importance of risk reduction and the impact of complications. Reaching goals set to optimize patients before hernia surgery should be a quality control parameter. The use of biological mesh in ventral hernia repair should be appraised critically. To improve adherence to guidelines and protocol decision tools, guideline training, easy ways of data-sharing, feedback loops and apps may be helpful.

Details

ISSN :
24749842
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BJS Open, 5, BJS Open, 5, 1, BJS Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9b54135986ab050a619bee23f5c87d51
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa057