Back to Search
Start Over
The equations of relative motion in the orbital reference frame
- Source :
- Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 124:215-234
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2015.
-
Abstract
- The analysis of relative motion of two spacecraft in Earth-bound orbits is usually carried out on the basis of simplifying assumptions. In particular, the reference spacecraft is assumed to follow a circular orbit, in which case the equations of relative motion are governed by the well-known Hill–Clohessy–Wiltshire equations. Circular motion is not, however, a solution when the Earth’s flattening is accounted for, except for equatorial orbits, where in any case the acceleration term is not Newtonian. Several attempts have been made to account for the $$J_2$$ effects, either by ingeniously taking advantage of their differential effects, or by cleverly introducing ad-hoc terms in the equations of motion on the basis of geometrical analysis of the $$J_2$$ perturbing effects. Analysis of relative motion about an unperturbed elliptical orbit is the next step in complexity. Relative motion about a $$J_2$$ -perturbed elliptic reference trajectory is clearly a challenging problem, which has received little attention. All these problems are based on either the Hill–Clohessy–Wiltshire equations for circular reference motion, or the de Vries/Tschauner–Hempel equations for elliptical reference motion, which are both approximate versions of the exact equations of relative motion. The main difference between the exact and approximate forms of these equations consists in the expression for the angular velocity and the angular acceleration of the rotating reference frame with respect to an inertial reference frame. The rotating reference frame is invariably taken as the local orbital frame, i.e., the RTN frame generated by the radial, the transverse, and the normal directions along the primary spacecraft orbit. Some authors have tried to account for the non-constant nature of the angular velocity vector, but have limited their correction to a mean motion value consistent with the $$J_2$$ perturbation terms. However, the angular velocity vector is also affected in direction, which causes precession of the node and the argument of perigee, i.e., of the entire orbital plane. Here we provide a derivation of the exact equations of relative motion by expressing the angular velocity of the RTN frame in terms of the state vector of the reference spacecraft. As such, these equations are completely general, in the sense that the orbit of the reference spacecraft need only be known through its ephemeris, and therefore subject to any force field whatever. It is also shown that these equations reduce to either the Hill–Clohessy–Wiltshire, or the Tschauner–Hempel equations, depending on the level of approximation. The explicit form of the equations of relative motion with respect to a $$J_2$$ -perturbed reference orbit is also introduced.
- Subjects :
- Physics
020301 aerospace & aeronautics
Constant of motion
Applied Mathematics
Equations of motion
Astronomy and Astrophysics
02 engineering and technology
Rotating reference frame
01 natural sciences
Computational Mathematics
Classical mechanics
Mean motion
0203 mechanical engineering
Space and Planetary Science
Modeling and Simulation
Physics::Space Physics
0103 physical sciences
Orbital motion
Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Mechanics of planar particle motion
Non-inertial reference frame
010303 astronomy & astrophysics
Euler force
Mathematical Physics
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15729478 and 09232958
- Volume :
- 124
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9aa8359c31b9da5ff5bdab629edd8c2c
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9660-1