Back to Search Start Over

Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care: a systematic literature review

Authors :
Marie Elf
Heidi Zeeman
Sarah-May Blaschke
Julie Bernhardt
Aaron Davis
Marcus White
Luis Pflaumer
Ruby Lipson-Smith
Lipson-Smith, Ruby
Pflaumer, Luis
Elf, Marie
Blaschke, Sarah-May
Davis, Aaron
White, Marcus
Zeeman, Heidi
Bernhardt, Julie
Source :
BMJ Open, BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 8 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMJ, 2021.

Abstract

ObjectivesTo identify, appraise and synthesise existing design evidence for inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities; to identify impacts of these built environments on the outcomes and experiences of people recovering from stroke, their family/caregivers and staff.DesignA convergent segregated review design was used to conduct a systematic review.Data sourcesOvid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched for articles published between January 2000 and November 2020.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesQualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies investigating the impact of the built environment of inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke survivors, their family/caregivers and/or staff.Data extraction and synthesisTwo authors separately completed the title, abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Extracted data were categorised according to the aspect of the built environment explored and the outcomes reported. These categories were used to structure a narrative synthesis of the results from all included studies.ResultsTwenty-four articles were included, most qualitative and exploratory. Half of the included articles investigated a particular aspect of the built environment, including environmental enrichment and communal areas (n=8), bedroom design (n=3) and therapy spaces (n=1), while the other half considered the environment in general. Findings related to one or more of the following outcome categories: (1) clinical outcomes, (2) patient activity, (3) patient well-being, (4) patient and/or staff safety and (5) clinical practice. Heterogeneous designs and variables of interest meant results could not be compared, but some repeated findings suggest that attractive and accessible communal areas are important for patient activity and well-being.ConclusionsStroke rehabilitation is a unique healthcare context where patient activity, practice and motivation are paramount. We found many evidence gaps that with more targeted research could better inform the design of rehabilitation spaces to optimise care.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020158006.

Details

ISSN :
20446055 and 42020158
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....99e5d524f7f1cd4f118299e7a8c6425d