Back to Search
Start Over
Effect of Real-time Patient-Centered Education Bundle on Administration of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Hospitalized Patients
- Source :
- JAMA Network Open
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- American Medical Association, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Key Points Question Can a real-time, targeted, patient-centered education bundle reduce nonadministration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients? Findings In this controlled preintervention-postintervention comparison trial of 19 652 adult patients on medical and surgical units, nonadministration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis significantly declined on units that received an intervention that combined an alert to a health educator about a missed dose of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with patient education compared with control units. Meaning Timely, targeted education significantly reduces nonadministration of VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized patients and improves health care quality by leveraging real-time data to target interventions for at-risk patients.<br />This pre-post intervention comparison study evaluates a real-time patient-centered education bundle intervention aimed to reduce nonadministration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among hospitalized patients in surgical and medical units.<br />Importance Numerous interventions have improved prescription of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis; however, many prescribed doses are not administered to hospitalized patients, primarily owing to patient refusal. Objective To evaluate a real-time, targeted, patient-centered education bundle intervention to reduce nonadministration of VTE prophylaxis. Design, Setting, and Participants This nonrandomized controlled, preintervention-postintervention comparison trial included 19 652 patient visits on 16 units at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, from April 1 through December 31, 2015. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2016, through November 30, 2017, on an intention-to-treat basis. Interventions Patients on 4 intervention units received a patient-centered education bundle if a dose of VTE prophylaxis medication was not administered. Patients on 12 control units received no intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures Conditional odds of nonadministration of doses of VTE prophylaxis (primary outcome) before and after the intervention on control vs intervention units. Reasons for nonadministration (ie, patient refusal and other) and VTE event rates (secondary outcomes) were compared. Results A total of 19 652 patient visits where at least 1 dose of VTE prophylaxis was prescribed were included (51.7% men; mean [SD] age, 55.6 [17.1] years). Preintervention and postintervention groups were relatively similar in age, sex, race, and medical or surgery unit. From the preintervention period to the postintervention period, on intervention units, the conditional odds of VTE prophylaxis nonadministration declined significantly (9.1% [95% CI, 5.2%-16.2%] vs 5.6% [95% CI, 3.1%-9.9%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.67) compared with no change on control units (13.6% [95% CI, 9.8%-18.7%] vs 13.3% [95% CI, 9.6%-18.5%]; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.07; P < .001 for interaction). The conditional odds of nonadministration owing to patient refusal decreased significantly on intervention units (5.9% [95% CI, 2.6%-13.6%] vs 3.4% [95% CI, 1.5%-7.8%]; OR, 0.53; 95% CI ,0.43-0.65) compared with no change on control units (8.7% [95% CI, 5.4%-14.0%] vs 8.5% [95% CI, 5.3%-13.8%]; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.08; P < .001 for interaction). On intervention units, the conditional odds of nonadministration owing to reasons other than patient refusal decreased (2.3% [95% CI, 1.5%-3.4%] vs 1.7% [95% CI, 1.1%-2.6%]; OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.94), with no change on control units (3.4% [95% CI, 2.7%-4.4%] vs 3.3% [95% CI, 2.6%-4.2%]; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.87-1.10; P = .04 for interaction). No differential effect occurred on medical vs surgical units (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.60-1.23; P = .41 for interaction). There was no statistical difference in the proportion of VTE events among patients on intervention vs control units (0.30% vs 0.18%; OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.16-2.23). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, a targeted patient-centered education bundle significantly reduced nonadministration of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized patients. This novel strategy improves health care quality by leveraging electronic data to target interventions in real time for at-risk patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02402881
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Psychological intervention
01 natural sciences
Odds
Treatment Refusal
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Patient Education as Topic
Intervention (counseling)
Internal medicine
Patient-Centered Care
Medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
0101 mathematics
Medical prescription
Original Investigation
Aged
business.industry
Research
010102 general mathematics
Anticoagulants
General Medicine
Odds ratio
Hematology
Venous Thromboembolism
Middle Aged
3. Good health
Clinical trial
Hospitalization
Online Only
Baltimore
Electronic data
Female
business
Patient Care Bundles
Health care quality
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 25743805
- Volume :
- 1
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- JAMA Network Open
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9930a449388d7b8c7006603c1728bc33