Back to Search Start Over

Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?

Authors :
Sigrun Holze
Max Bräunlich
Meinhard Mende
Vinodh-Kumar-Adithyaa Arthanareeswaran
Petra Neuhaus
Michael C. Truss
Hoang Minh Do
Anja Dietel
Toni Franz
Dogu Teber
Ann-Kathrin Heilsberg
Markus Hohenfellner
Robert Rabenalt
Peter Albers
Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Source :
World Journal of Urology. 40:1151-1158
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022.

Abstract

Objective Age is known to have an impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, age differences can be investigated from a cross-sectional as well as from a longitudinal perspective. This study combines both perspectives. Materials and methods LAP-01 is the first multicenter randomized patient blinded trial comparing outcomes after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RP. This study stratified the entire population that received nerve-sparing surgery and was potent at baseline by the following ages: ≤ 60 years, 61–65 years, and > 65 years. Potency was assessed using the IIEF-5. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used for global health perception and the EORTC QLQ-PR25 for urinary symptoms. Continence was assessed by the number of pads used. Longitudinal change was assessed using either validated anchor-based criteria or the 1 or 0.5-standard-deviation criterion. Worsening of continence was measured by increasing numbers of pads. Results 310 patients were included into this study. Older patients had a significantly higher risk for worsening of continence at 3 and 6 months (OR 2.21, 95% CI [1.22, 4.02], p = 0.009 and OR 2.00, 95% CI [1.16, 3.46], p = 0.013, respectively); at 12 months, the odds of worsening did not differ significantly between age groups. Potency scores were better in younger patients from a cross-sectional perspective, but longitudinal change did not differ between the age groups. In contrast, global health perception was better in older patients from a cross-sectional perspective and longitudinal decreases were significantly more common among the youngest patients, at 12 months (36.9% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.038). Conclusion From a cross-sectional perspective, function scores were better in younger patients, but from a longitudinal perspective, age differences were found in continence only. In contrast, global health scores were better in older patients from a cross-sectional and longitudinal perspective. Trial registration The LAP-01 trial was registered with the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trial registry (clinicaltrials.gov), NCT number: NCT03682146, and with the German Clinical Trial registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), DRKS ID number: DRKS00007138.

Details

ISSN :
14338726
Volume :
40
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
World Journal of Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....992007942fe06923bb9c8bda1e0aec8a