Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic test accuracy of Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners in detecting amblyogenic risk factors in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Authors :
Bing Jiang
Xian Zhang
Ying Li
Jiaxing Wang
Source :
Ophthalmicphysiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 39(4)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose Amblyopia is a permanent visual impairment developed in early childhood. Recently, instrument-based photoscreeners have been widely used for vision screening to detect amblyopia risk factors, which is key for the prevention and treatment of amblyopia. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy of Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners in detecting risk factors for amblyopia in children. Methods An electronic literature search was performed in October 2018 using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Twenty-one publications with a total of 5022 subjects were included. Subjects given a comprehensive examination were considered to have amblyopia or amblyogenic risk factors based on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) referral criteria guidelines. Results The overall sensitivity for Spot and Plusoptix was 87.7% and 89.4%, respectively (p = 0.38); the specificity was 78.0% and 89.9%, respectively (p = 0.90). For subjects under 7 years old (preschool children), the overall sensitivity for Spot and Plusoptix was 91.7% and 90.2%, respectively (p = 0.81); the specificity was 82.6% and 93.0%, respectively (p = 0.46). Conclusion Both Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity in detecting amblyopia risk factors in children, especially at preschool ages. There was no significant difference in diagnostic test accuracy between them.

Details

ISSN :
14751313
Volume :
39
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Ophthalmicphysiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....984651de9385faceafabc4153a5b209b