Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of heating and current drive mix on the ITER hybrid scenario
- Source :
- Nuclear Fusion, 50, 16
- Publication Year :
- 2010
-
Abstract
- Hybrid scenario performance in ITER is studied with the CRONOS integrated modelling suite, using the GLF23 anomalous transport model for heat transport prediction. GLF23 predicted core confinement is optimized through tailoring the q-profile shape by a careful choice of current drive actuators, affecting the transport due to the predicted dependence of the turbulence level on the absolute q-profile values and magnetic shear. A range of various heating and current drive choices are examined, as are different assumptions on the pedestal height. The optimum q-profile shape is predicted to be one that maximizes the ratio of s/q throughout the bulk of the plasma volume. Optimizing the confinement allows a minimization of the plasma density required in order to achieve a defined target fusion power of 350 MW. A lower density then allows a lower total current (I p) at the same Greenwald fraction (f G), thus aiding in maintaining q > 1 as desired in a hybrid scenario, and in minimizing the flux consumption. The best performance is achieved with a combination of NBI and ECCD (e.g. 33/37 MW NBI/ECCD for a scenario with a pedestal height of 4 keV). The q-profile shape and plasma confinement properties are shown to be highly sensitive to the positioning of the ECCD deposition. Comparisons with the lower performing cases where some or all of the ECCD power is replaced with LHCD or ICRH are shown (e.g. 33/20/17 MW NBI/ECCD/LHCD or NBI/ECCD/ICRH). The inclusion of LHCD reduces confinement due to deleterious shaping of the q-profile, and the inclusion of ICRH, particularly in a stiff model, does not lead to significantly increased fusion power and furthermore does not contribute to the non-inductive current fraction. For the optimum NBI/ECCD current drive mix, the predictions show that a satisfactory ITER hybrid scenario (P fus ∼ 350 MW, Q ⩾ 5, q min close to 1) may be achieved with T ped ⩾ 4 keV. In addition, predicted performance sensitivity analysis was carried out for several assumed parameters, such as Z eff and density peaking.
- Subjects :
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Materials science
Nuclear engineering
Magnetic confinement fusion
Flux
Fusion power
Condensed Matter Physics
01 natural sciences
7. Clean energy
010305 fluids & plasmas
Power (physics)
Pedestal
13. Climate action
0103 physical sciences
Heat transfer
Sensitivity (control systems)
Atomic physics
Current (fluid)
010306 general physics
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Nuclear Fusion, 50, 16
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....98425605bf718c674251f3448829362f