Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes of Patients with Positive Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Continuing ABVD in the Clinical Setting

Authors :
Serena Zheng
Kanika Gupta
Piyush Goyal
Reiko Nakajima
Laure Michaud
Connie Lee Batlevi
Paul A. Hamlin
Steven Horwitz
Anita Kumar
Matthew J. Matasar
Alison J. Moskowitz
Craig H. Moskowitz
Ariela Noy
M. Lia Palomba
David J. Straus
Gottfried Von Keudell
Lorenzo Falchi
Joachim Yahalom
Andrew D. Zelenetz
Anas Younes
Gilles Salles
Heiko Schöder
Erel Joffe
Source :
Cancers; Volume 15; Issue 6; Pages: 1760
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2023.

Abstract

Recent prospective clinical trial data suggest that patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma who continue treatment with ABVD, despite failing to attain a complete metabolic response on interim PET (PET2+), may fare better than previously published. We describe the outcomes of PET2+ patients who continued ABVD and compare the performance of a quantitative measure based on the lesion-to-liver SUV ratio (LLS qPET2+) to that of the subjective Deauville criteria (dvPET2+). We analyzed all patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with frontline ABVD at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2008 and 2017. Eligibility was set to correspond with the RATHL inclusion criteria. Images were reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians and discordant cases were resolved with a third expert in consensus. qPET2+ was defined as LLS ≥ 1.3. We identified 227 patients of whom 25% (57) were qPET2+, but only 14% (31) were dvPET2+. Forty-eight patients (84%) continued ABVD with a 3-year PFS of 70% for qPET2+ and 64% for dvPET2+. In conclusion, interim PET interpretation in clinical practice may be associated with a higher rate of scans deemed positive. Irrespective of the criteria for PET2 positivity, a subset of patients may continue ABVD without a dismal outcome.

Details

ISSN :
20726694
Volume :
15
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancers
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9838cdd25eddb490cf6c66eeeb87bb66
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061760