Back to Search Start Over

The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts

Authors :
Mauro Galetti
Sophie Monsarrat
Lilian Sales
Mathias Mistretta Pires
Ana Carnaval
Jens-Christian Svenning
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Concordia University
University of Miami
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
The City University of New York
Aarhus University
Source :
Scopus, Repositório Institucional da UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), instacron:UNESP, Sales, L P, Galetti, M, Carnaval, A, Monsarrat, S, Svenning, J C & Pires, M M 2022, ' The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts ', Global change biology, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 3683-3693 . https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16145
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

Made available in DSpace on 2022-05-01T15:46:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022-01-01 Humans have reshaped the distribution of biodiversity across the globe, extirpating species from regions otherwise suitable and restricting populations to a subset of their original ranges. Here, we ask if anthropogenic range contractions since the Late Pleistocene led to an under-representation of the realized niches for megafauna, an emblematic group of taxa often targeted for restoration actions. Using reconstructions of past geographic distributions (i.e., natural ranges) for 146 extant terrestrial large-bodied (>44 kg) mammals, we estimate their climatic niches as if they had retained their original distributions and evaluate their observed niche dynamics. We found that range contractions led to a sizeable under-representation of the realized niches of several species (i.e., niche unfilling). For 29 species, more than 10% of the environmental space once seen in their natural ranges has been lost due to anthropogenic activity, with at least 12 species undergoing reductions of more than 50% of their realized niches. Eighteen species may now be confined to low-suitability locations, where fitness and abundance are likely diminished; we consider these taxa 'climatic refugees'. For those species, conservation strategies supported by current ranges risk being misguided if current, suboptimal habitats are considered baseline for future restoration actions. Because most climate-based biodiversity forecasts rely exclusively on current occurrence records, we went on to test the effect of neglecting historical information on estimates of species’ potential distribution – as a proxy of sensitivity to climate change. We found that niche unfilling driven by past range contraction leads to an overestimation of sensitivity to future climatic change, resulting in 50% higher rates of global extinction, and underestimating the potential for megafauna conservation and restoration under future climate change. In conclusion, range contractions since the Late Pleistocene have also left imprints on megafauna realized climatic niches. Therefore, niche truncation driven by defaunation can directly affect climate and habitat-based conservation strategies. Department of Animal Biology Institute of Biology University of Campinas (UNICAMP) Department of Biology Faculty of Arts and Science Concordia University Department of Biology University of Miami Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Biodiversidade Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Department of Biology and Biology Ph.D. Program The Graduate Center of CUNY The City University of New York Department of Biology Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE) and Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity Aarhus University Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Biodiversidade Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Details

ISSN :
13652486 and 13541013
Volume :
28
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Global Change Biology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....97b809daeec24bbaa9dbbbc18458980a