Back to Search
Start Over
Feasibility and accuracy of a novel automated three-dimensional ultrasonographic analysis system for abdominal aortic aneurysm: comparison with two-dimensional ultrasonography and computed tomography
- Source :
- Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background Accurate measurement of the maximum aortic diameter (Dmax) is crucial for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Aortic computed tomography (CT) provides accurate Dmax values by three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction but may cause nephrotoxicity because of contrast use and radiation hazard. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a novel semi-automated 3-D ultrasonography (3-D US) system compared with that of CT as a reference. Methods Patients with AAA (n = 59) or individuals with normal aorta (n = 18) were prospectively recruited in an outpatient setting. Two-dimensional ultrasonography (2-D US) and 3-D US images were acquired with a single-sweep volumetric transducer. The analysis was performed offline with a software. Dmax and the vessel area of the Dmax slice were measured with 2-D US, 3-D US, and CT. The lumen and thrombus areas of the Dmax slice were also measured in 40 patients with intraluminal thrombus. Vessel and thrombus volumes were measured using 3-D US and CT. Results The Dmax values from 3-D US demonstrated better agreement (R2 = 0.984) with the CT values than with the 2-D US values (R2 = 0.938). Overall, 2-D US underestimated Dmax compared with 3-D US (32.3 ± 12.1 mm vs. 35.1 ± 12.0 mm). The Bland-Altman analysis of the 3-D US values, revealed better agreement with the CT values (2 standard deviations [SD], 2.9 mm) than with the 2-D US values (2 SD, 5.4 mm). The vessel, lumen, and thrombus areas all demonstrated better agreement with CT than with 2-D US (R2 = 0.986 vs. 0.960 for the vessel, R2 = 0.891 vs. 0.837 for the lumen, and R2 = 0.977 vs. 0.872 for the thrombus). The thrombus volume assessed with 3-D US showed good correlation with the CT value (R2 = 0.981 and 2 SD in the Bland-Altman analysis: 13.6 cm3). Conclusions Our novel semi-automated 3-D US analysis system provides more accurate Dmax values than 2-D US and provides precise volumetric data, which were not evaluable with 2-D US. The application of the semi-automated 3-D US analysis system in abdominal aorta assessment is easy and accurate.
- Subjects :
- Male
lcsh:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
medicine.medical_specialty
Lumen (anatomy)
Computed tomography
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
0302 clinical medicine
Software validation
medicine.artery
Internal medicine
Humans
Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Aorta, Abdominal
Prospective Studies
Thrombus
Aged
Ultrasonography
Angiology
Aorta
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Research
Ultrasound
Abdominal aorta
General Medicine
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Abdominal aortic aneurysm
lcsh:RC666-701
Three-dimensional imaging
Feasibility Studies
Female
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Nuclear medicine
business
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Follow-Up Studies
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14767120
- Volume :
- 18
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Cardiovascular Ultrasound
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....979ce7250118f59b16dcdab1e88cce8e
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-00207-0