Back to Search
Start Over
Analgesic Effects of Intravenous Acetaminophen vs Placebo for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- American Medical Association, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Importance Intravenous acetaminophen is a commonly prescribed analgesic for the prevention and treatment of postsurgical pain. Its efficacy in the context of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has yielded mixed results. Objective To compare the efficacy of perioperative intravenous acetaminophen (IVAPAP) with that of placebo in improving early postoperative pain after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, randomized clinical trial including 62 patients undergoing ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis in a single tertiary referral hospital. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive 1 g of IVAPAP or 100 mL of placebo consisting of saline infusions immediately before the start of surgery and 4 hours after the initial dose. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was postoperative pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS) scores up to 24 hours after surgery by blinded observers. Secondary endpoints included postoperative opioid (intravenous and oral) use and adverse events in the 24-hour postoperative period. Results Of the 62 enrolled adult participants, 60 were randomized (31 to IVAPAP intervention and 29 to placebo). The mean (SD) age of participants was 53.7 (14.7) years and 35 (58%) of the participants were men and 25 (42%) were women. Within the first hour, mean pain scores were reduced in the IVAPAP group compared with the control group, reaching a maximum difference of 7.7 mm on a VAS scale favoring the treatment group with a true difference possibly as high as 22 mm, and the data are compatible with a clinically meaningful difference. At 12- and 24-hours, average pain scores were less in the placebo group and the data are compatible with a clinically meaningful difference of 5.8 (−5.2 to 16.8) and 8.2 (−1.9 to 18.4), respectively, favoring the placebo group. However, at all time points the CIs included the null value and were wide, thus preventing definitive conclusions. Inspection of the secondary outcomes favored IVAPAP, but the wide range of the CIs and inclusion of the null value prevent definitive conclusions. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this study are inconclusive. The data suggest that perioperative intravenous acetaminophen may reduce immediate postoperative pain and opioid requirements compared with placebo and these differences could be clinically meaningful. Unfortunately, the imprecision of the estimates prevents definitive conclusion. Use of IVAPAP does not seem to increase adverse events. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01608308
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Visual analogue scale
Analgesic
Context (language use)
Placebo
law.invention
Placebos
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Double-Blind Method
Randomized controlled trial
law
Paranasal Sinuses
medicine
Humans
Pain Management
Prospective Studies
Sinusitis
Infusions, Intravenous
030223 otorhinolaryngology
Adverse effect
Prospective cohort study
Pain Measurement
Rhinitis
Original Investigation
Acetaminophen
Analgesics
Pain, Postoperative
business.industry
digestive, oral, and skin physiology
Endoscopy
Perioperative
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Middle Aged
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Otorhinolaryngology
Anesthesia
Female
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....96cd7f022e84538c976bcbf7a70c3612