Back to Search
Start Over
A model to identify individuals with a high probability of a SARS-CoV-2 infection
- Source :
- The Journal of Infection
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd., 2020.
-
Abstract
- Highlights • Centralised laboratory PCR testing for COVID-19 is associated with long delays • The FebriDx POCT can detect an antiviral host response protein (MxA) in 10 minutes • We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FebriDx in 251 patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 during the first wave • Compared to PCR sensitivity of FebriDx was 93% and specificity was 86% • FebriDx could be used as a rapid front door triage tool in hospitals<br />Introduction Management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals this leads to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission and so rapid, accurate diagnostic tests are urgently required. The FebriDx is a point-of-care test that detects an antiviral host response protein in finger prick blood within 10 minutes, but its accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 is unknown. Methods We performed a real-world diagnostic accuracy study of FebriDx in hospitalised patients during the first wave of the pandemic. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on FebriDx results compared to the reference standard of SARS-CoV-2 PCR on combined nose and throat swabs. A multivariable predictive model including FebriDx, age, sex, and clinical characteristics was developed and underwent internal validation. Results FebriDx was performed on 251 patients and gave a valid result in 248. 118 of 248 (48%) were PCR positive for COVID-19. FebriDx results were available after 10 minutes compared with 1.7 (1.6 to 2.1) hours with point-of-care PCR testing and 23.4 (17.2 to 31.1) hours with laboratory PCR testing. Sensitivity of FebriDx for the identification of COVID-19 was 93% (110/118; 95% CI 87 to 97%) and specificity was 86% (112/130; 95%CI 79 to 92%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 6.73 (95%CI 4.37 to 10.37) and 0.08 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.15) respectively. In the multivariate model age, sex and other clinical features did not contribute significantly to the effect of the FebriDx result in distinguishing patients with and without COVID-19. Conclusions During the first wave of the pandemic, FebriDx had high accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 in hospitalised adults and could be deployed as a front door triage tool. Trial registration ISRCTN14966673
- Subjects :
- Point of care testing
Microbiology (medical)
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
SARS-CoV-2
business.industry
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Medizin
COVID-19
MxA
Virology
Article
Infectious Diseases
Point-of-Care Testing
Host response
Humans
Medicine
Coronavirus Infections
business
Letter to the Editor
Accuracy
Probability
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15322742 and 01634453
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Journal of Infection
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....96074bfd780f112f4e99dcd9bbbe602e