Back to Search Start Over

Inotersen treatment for patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis

Authors :
Morton A. Scheinberg
Jesse Kwoh
Edward Gane
Laura Obici
Thomas H. Brannagan
Brett P. Monia
Giampaolo Merlini
Shiangtung W. Jung
Josep Gamez
Morie A. Gertz
John L. Berk
Scott D. Solomon
Fabio Barroso
Brian M. Drachman
Márcia Waddington-Cruz
David C. Adams
Hartmut H. Schmidt
Carol J. Whelan
Violaine Planté-Bordeneuve
William J. Litchy
Peter D. Gorevic
Elizabeth J. Ackermann
Annabel K. Wang
Brenda F. Baker
Isabel Conceição
Steven G. Hughes
Merrill D. Benson
Josep M. Campistol
Bradley W. McEvoy
Michael Polydefkis
Teresa Coelho
Giuseppe Vita
Peter J. Dyck
Amil M. Shah
Stephen B. Heitner
Source :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis is caused by pathogenic single-nucleotide variants in the gene encoding transthyretin ( TTR) that induce transthyretin misfolding and systemic deposition of amyloid. Progressive amyloid accumulation leads to multiorgan dysfunction and death. Inotersen, a 2'- O-methoxyethyl-modified antisense oligonucleotide, inhibits hepatic production of transthyretin. METHODS: We conducted an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 15-month, phase 3 trial of inotersen in adults with stage 1 (patient is ambulatory) or stage 2 (patient is ambulatory with assistance) hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive weekly subcutaneous injections of inotersen (300 mg) or placebo. The primary end points were the change in the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score+7 (mNIS+7; range, -22.3 to 346.3, with higher scores indicating poorer function; minimal clinically meaningful change, 2 points) and the change in the score on the patient-reported Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) questionnaire (range, -4 to 136, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life). A decrease in scores indicated improvement. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients (112 in the inotersen group and 60 in the placebo group) received at least one dose of a trial regimen, and 139 (81%) completed the intervention period. Both primary efficacy assessments favored inotersen: the difference in the least-squares mean change from baseline to week 66 between the two groups (inotersen minus placebo) was -19.7 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -26.4 to -13.0; P

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....95fdbf6a28c8960b7f39722805188ea4