Back to Search Start Over

MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum

Authors :
Ignace Vergote
Mansoor Raza Mirza
David Cibula
Gunnar B. Kristensen
Martin K. Oehler
Ignacio Romero
Peter Vuylsteke
Nicoletta Colombo
Elsa Kalbacher
Robert L. Coleman
Regina Berger
Cristina Maria Churruca
Rachel N. Grisham
Jalid Sehouli
Bradley J. Monk
Andrew R Clamp
Kathleen N. Moore
Anneke M. Westermann
Carol Aghajanian
Amit M. Oza
Esther Drill
Susana Banerjee
Josep M. del Campo
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
David M. O'Malley
Janna Christy-Bittel
Adam P Boyd
Sandro Pignata
Christian Marth
Felix Hilpert
Oncology
CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life
Monk, B
Grisham, R
Banerjee, S
Kalbacher, E
Mirza, M
Romero, I
Vuylsteke, P
Coleman, R
Hilpert, F
Oza, A
Westermann, A
Oehler, M
Pignata, S
Aghajanian, C
Colombo, N
Drill, E
Cibula, D
Moore, K
Christy-Bittel, J
Del Campo, J
Berger, R
Marth, C
Sehouli, J
O'Malley, D
Churruca, C
Boyd, A
Kristensen, G
Clamp, A
Ray-Coquard, I
Vergote, I
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of clinical oncology, 38(32), 3753-3762. American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

PURPOSE Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity across multiple cancers, in LGSOC. METHODS This was a 2:1 randomized study of binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) versus physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCC). Eligible patients had recurrent measurable LGSOC after ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy but ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy lines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR); additional assessments included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), clinical-benefit rate, biomarkers, and safety. RESULTS A total of 303 patients were randomly assigned to an arm of the study at the time of interim analysis (January 20, 2016). Median PFS by BICR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 11.3) for binimetinib and 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.5) for PCC (hazard ratio,1.21; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.86), resulting in early study closure according to a prespecified futility boundary after 341 patients had enrolled. Secondary efficacy end points were similar in the two groups: ORR 16% (complete response [CR]/partial responses[PRs], 32) versus 13% (CR/PRs, 13); median DOR, 8.1 months (range, 0.03 to ≥ 12.0 months) versus 6.7 months (0.03 to ≥ 9.7 months); and median OS, 25.3 versus 20.8 months for binimetinib and PCC, respectively. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of binimetinib; the most common grade ≥ 3 event was increased blood creatine kinase level (26%). Post hoc analysis suggests a possible association between KRAS mutation and response to binimetinib. Results from an updated analysis (n = 341; January 2019) were consistent. CONCLUSION Although the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point, binimetinib showed activity in LGSOC across the efficacy end points evaluated. A higher response to chemotherapy than expected was observed and KRAS mutation might predict response to binimetinib.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
38
Issue :
32
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....958751b87c1b59ea1b3870c75aa8908b