Back to Search Start Over

Gradual tapering TNF inhibitors versus conventional synthetic DMARDs after achieving controlled disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: first-year results of the randomised controlled TARA study

Authors :
Yael de Man
Yvonne P M Goekoop-Ruiterman
Ilja Tchetverikov
Elise van Mulligen
T H Esmeralda Molenaar
J.B. Harbers
C. Bijkerk
Myrthe van der Ven
Angelique E. A. M. Weel
Johanna M. W. Hazes
Jendé van Zeben
Jolanda J. Luime
T.M. Kuijper
Pascal H P de Jong
Cathelijne W. Y. Appels
Eindhoven MedTech Innovation Center
Signal Processing Systems
Rheumatology
Source :
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 78(6), 746-753. BMJ Publishing Group
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two tapering strategies after achieving controlled disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), during 1 year of follow-up.MethodsIn this multicentre single-blinded (research nurses) randomised controlled trial, patients with RA were included who achieved controlled disease, defined as a Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤ 2.4 and a Swollen Joint Count (SJC) ≤ 1, treated with both a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and a TNF inhibitor. Eligible patients were randomised into gradual tapering csDMARDs or TNF inhibitors. Medication was tapered if the RA was still under control, by cutting the dosage into half, a quarter and thereafter it was stopped. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with a disease flare, defined as DAS > 2.4 and/or SJC > 1. Secondary outcomes were DAS, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) and functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) after 1 year and over time.ResultsA total of 189 patients were randomly assigned to tapering csDMARDs (n = 94) or tapering anti-TNF (n = 95). The cumulative flare rates in the csDMARD and anti-TNF tapering group were, respectively, 33 % (95% CI,24% to 43 %) and 43 % (95% CI, 33% to 53 % (p = 0.17). Mean DAS, HAQ-DI and EQ-5D did not differ between tapering groups after 1 year and over time.ConclusionUp to 9 months, flare rates of tapering csDMARDs or TNF inhibitors were similar. After 1 year, a non-significant difference was found of 10 % favouring csDMARD tapering. Tapering TNF inhibitors was, therefore, not superior to tapering csDMARDs. From a societal perspective, it would be sensible to taper the TNF inhibitor first, because of possible cost reductions and less long-term side effects.Trial registration numberNTR2754

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034967
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 78(6), 746-753. BMJ Publishing Group
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....956206b75710f862b6a7f8bf4c7d9aa7