Back to Search Start Over

Glaucoma Specialist Detection of Optical Coherence Tomography Suspicious Rim Tissue in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspect Eyes

Authors :
Brad Fortune
Ruojin Ren
Hongli Yang
Stuart K. Gardiner
Shaban Demirel
Seung Woo Hong
Helen Koenigsman
Juan Reynaud
Claude F. Burgoyne
Robert M. Kinast
Steven L. Mansberger
Source :
American Journal of Ophthalmology. 199:28-43
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess glaucoma specialists’ detection of optic nerve head (ONH) rim tissue that is thin by optical coherence tomography (OCT) criteria. DESIGN: Reliability analysis METHODS: 5 clinicians marked the disc margin (DM) and rim margin (RM) on stereo-photos of 151 glaucoma or glaucoma suspect eyes obtained within 3 months of OCT imaging. The photo and OCT infrared image for each eye were colocalized and regionalized into twelve sectors relative to the axis between Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO) centroid and the fovea. For each clinician, the distance from BMO centroid to their DM (DM radius) and RM (RM radius) was used to generate sectoral rim width (RW) (DM radius – RM radius) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) (RM radius / DM radius) estimates. OCT minimum rim width (MRW) was determined by sector. Among all eyes, for each OCT MRW suspicious sector (< 5% of OCT normative data base), we determined each clinician’s detection (clinician CDR ≥ 0.7). RESULTS: Clinicians most commonly failed to detect OCT suspicious rim tissue in the nasal sectors. Among 502 sectors with suspicious OCT MRW all 5 clinicians rated CDR ≥ 0.7 in only 29.5% and all 5 clinicians rated CDR < 0.7 in 21%. OCT suspicious rim thickness was most common (32% of eyes) in the nasal and inferior sectors. MRW vs clinician RW discordance was greatest nasally, while BMO vs clinician DM discordance was greatest temporally. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians most commonly failed to detect OCT suspicious rim thickness nasally where suspicious rim tissues were also most common.

Details

ISSN :
00029394
Volume :
199
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....950b81cbadcb162ff448e1f4ac300bcd
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.10.027