Back to Search Start Over

Participant characteristics and self-reported weight status in a cross-sectional pilot survey of self-identified followers of popular diets: Adhering to Dietary Approaches for Personal Taste (ADAPT) Feasibility Survey

Authors :
Micaela Karlsen
Nicola M. McKeown
Kara A Livingston
Alice H. Lichtenstein
Sara C. Folta
Gail Rogers
Christina D. Economos
Remco Chang
Paul F. Jacques
Source :
Public Health Nutrition
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Abstract

Objective:To describe characteristics of self-identified popular diet followers and compare mean BMI across these diets, stratified by time following diet.Design:Cross-sectional, web-based survey administered in 2015.Setting:Non-localised, international survey.Participants:Self-selected followers of popular diets (n 9019) were recruited to the survey via social media and email announcements by diet community leaders, categorised into eight major diet groups.Results:General linear models were used to compare mean BMI among (1) short-term (P < 0·05 for all) among longer-term followers (≥1 year) of whole food, plant-based (WFPB), vegan, whole food and low-carb diets compared with shorter-term followers. Among those following their diet for 1–5 years (n 4067), geometric mean BMI (kg/m2) were lower (P < 0·05 for all) for all groups compared with TTEH (26·4 kg/m2): WFPB (23·2 kg/m2), vegan (23·5 kg/m2), Paleo (24·6 kg/m2), vegetarian (25·0 kg/m2), whole food (24·6 kg/m2), Weston A. Price (23·5 kg/m2) and low-carb (24·7 kg/m2).Conclusion:Our findings suggest that BMI is lower among individuals who made active decisions to adhere to a specific diet, particularly more plant-based diets and/or diets limiting highly processed foods, compared with those who simply TTEH. BMI is also lower among individuals who follow intentional eating plans for longer time periods.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14752727 and 13689800
Volume :
23
Issue :
15
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Public Health Nutrition
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....93b60a7cc0507d88911e42bf799b6e73