Back to Search Start Over

Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data

Authors :
Yasmin Beazer-Barclay
Kristen J. Antonellis
Francois Collin
Uwe Scherf
Rafael A. Irizarry
Bridget G. Hobbs
Terence P. Speed
Source :
ResearcherID
Publication Year :
2003
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2003.

Abstract

SUMMARY In this paper we report exploratory analyses of high-density oligonucleotide array data from the Affymetrix GeneChip R � system with the objective of improving upon currently used measures of gene expression. Our analyses make use of three data sets: a small experimental study consisting of five MGU74A mouse GeneChip R � arrays, part of the data from an extensive spike-in study conducted by Gene Logic and Wyeth’s Genetics Institute involving 95 HG-U95A human GeneChip R � arrays; and part of a dilution study conducted by Gene Logic involving 75 HG-U95A GeneChip R � arrays. We display some familiar features of the perfect match and mismatch probe ( PM and MM )v alues of these data, and examine the variance–mean relationship with probe-level data from probes believed to be defective, and so delivering noise only. We explain why we need to normalize the arrays to one another using probe level intensities. We then examine the behavior of the PM and MM using spike-in data and assess three commonly used summary measures: Affymetrix’s (i) average difference (AvDiff) and (ii) MAS 5.0 signal, and (iii) the Li and Wong multiplicative model-based expression index (MBEI). The exploratory data analyses of the probe level data motivate a new summary measure that is a robust multiarray average (RMA) of background-adjusted, normalized, and log-transformed PM values. We evaluate the four expression summary measures using the dilution study data, assessing their behavior in terms of bias, variance and (for MBEI and RMA) model fit. Finally, we evaluate the algorithms in terms of their ability to detect known levels of differential expression using the spike-in data. We conclude that there is no obvious downside to using RMA and attaching a standard error (SE) to this quantity using a linear model which removes probe-specific affinities. ∗ To whom correspondence should be addressed

Details

ISSN :
14684357 and 14654644
Volume :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Biostatistics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9316d9f82ddfa36c1b65e1f8a018aa1c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249