Back to Search Start Over

Long-term standard sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer: a single institution ten-year follow-up

Authors :
Paolo Veronesi
Giovanni Corso
Viviana Galimberti
Vincenzo Bagnardi
Marco Colleoni
Mattia Intra
Giuseppe Viale
Sabrina Kahler-Ribeiro-Fontana
Chiara Maria Grana
Emilia Montagna
Luca Bottiglieri
Jorge Villanova Biasuz
Eliana La Rocca
Silvia Ratini
Fiorella Canegallo
Consuelo Morigi
Eleonora Pagan
Francesca Magnoni
Maria Cristina Leonardi
Elisa Vicini
Kahler-Ribeiro-Fontana, S
Pagan, E
Magnoni, F
Vicini, E
Morigi, C
Corso, G
Intra, M
Canegallo, F
Ratini, S
Leonardi, M
La Rocca, E
Bagnardi, V
Montagna, E
Colleoni, M
Viale, G
Bottiglieri, L
Grana, C
Biasuz, J
Veronesi, P
Galimberti, V
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Introduction In patients with positive lymph nodes (cN+) prior to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), which convert to a clinically negative axilla (cN0) after treatment, the use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is still debatable, since the false-negative rate (FNR) is significantly high (12.6–14.2%). The objective of this retrospective mono-institutional study, with a long follow-up, aimed to evaluate the outcome in patients undergoing NAT who remained or converted to cN0 and received SNB independent of target axillary dissection (TAD) or the removal of at least 3 sentinel nodes (SNs). Methods This study analyzed 688 consecutive cT1-3, cN0/1/2 patients, operated at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, from 2000 to 2015 who became or remained cN0 after NAT and underwent SNB with a least one SN found. Axillary dissection (AD) was not performed if the SN was negative. Nodal radiotherapy (RT) was not mandatory. Results Axillary failure occurred in 1.8% of the initially cN1/2 patients and in 1.5% of the initially cN0 patients. After a median follow-up of 9.2 years (IQR 5.3–12.3), the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) were 91.3% (95% CI, 88.8–93.2) and 81.0% (95% CI, 77.2–84.2) in the whole cohort, 92.0% (95% CI, 89.0–94.2) and 81.5% (95% CI, 76.9–85.2) in those initially cN0, 89.8% (95% CI, 85.0–93.2) and 80.1% (95% CI, 72.8–85.7) in those initially cN1/2. Conclusion The 10-year follow-up confirmed our preliminary data that the use of standard SNB is acceptable in cN1/2 patients who become cN0 after NAT and will not translate into a worse outcome.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....92cba9bc83356aa6a016c9c03159face