Back to Search Start Over

Comparison between two clomiphene citrate protocols for induction of ovulation in clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome

Authors :
Mervat Sheikh-El-Arab Elsedeek
Eman A. Elgindy
Source :
Middle East Fertility Society Journal, Vol 19, Iss 4, Pp 243-247 (2014)
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2014.

Abstract

Objective To compare two protocols of CC therapy for induction of ovulation in a group CC resistant PCOS women. Study design Double blind randomized controlled trial. Subjects and methods 260 nulliparous CC resistant PCOS women randomized between two groups; In the first group each patient received 200 mg/day for 5 days while the second group received 100 mg/day for 10 days, both starting on day 3 of progestin induced withdrawal bleeding. Main outcome measures Ovulation defined as at least one follicle reaching ⩾14 mm diameter, and confirmed by timed serum progesterone. Secondary outcome measures included; number of dominant follicles, endometrial thickness, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. Results The extended protocol resulted in significantly higher ovulation, pregnancy, and live-birth rates than the high dose protocol ( p 0.001). Serum FSH levels on day 6 of treatment were comparable between the two groups while the level on day 11 was significantly higher in the second group ( p 0.02). Serum LH levels were comparable both on days 6 and 11. Patients on longer protocol (group II) required a longer time to ovulate (18 ± 4.4 versus 14 ± 3.6 days) but had a significantly higher endometrial thickness at the time of ovulation. ( p 0.02) FSH and LH levels were comparable between responders and non-responders in both groups. Conclusions The current study reports significantly higher ovulation and pregnancy rates with the longer lower dose protocol probably because of prolonged FSH rise. Study web address: ACTRN12611000639921.

Details

ISSN :
11105690
Volume :
19
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9284c81166b5167db7447547b3b83dfb
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2013.05.012