Back to Search Start Over

The joint role of spatial ability and imagery strategy in sustaining the learning of spatial descriptions under spatial interference

Authors :
Rossana De Beni
Chiara Meneghetti
Valérie Gyselinck
Francesca Pazzaglia
Department of General Psychology
Universita degli Studi di Padova
Laboratoire Mémoire et Cognition
Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 ( UPD5 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS )
Source :
Learning and individual differences, Learning and individual differences, 2013, p32-41. ⟨10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.021⟩, Learning and individual differences, 2013, p32-41. 〈10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.021〉
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2013.

Abstract

The present study investigates the joint role of spatial ability, imagery strategy and visuospatial working memory (VSWM) in spatial text processing. A set of 180 participants, half of them trained on the use of imagery strategy (training vs no-training groups), was further divided according to participants' high or low mental rotation ability (HMR vs LMR). Each group listened to environment descriptions and performed recall tasks before and immediately after training/no-training, and again after listening to a text while performing a spatial tapping task. Visuospatial and verbal tests were also administered. Our results showed that HMR had a better spatial profile than LMR participants, and that only LMR participants benefited fromtraining and showed the interference effect. Overall, our findings indicate that a good spatial ability reduces the spatial interference effect and that poor spatial ability,which is related to the spatial interference effect, can be partially compensated by learning imagery strategy.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Learning and individual differences, Learning and individual differences, 2013, p32-41. ⟨10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.021⟩, Learning and individual differences, 2013, p32-41. 〈10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.021〉
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....91fb595af0a18e19397588684ea36ebc
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.021⟩