Back to Search Start Over

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Microendoscopic Laminotomy for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A 5-Year Follow-up Study Compared With Conventional Laminoplasty

Authors :
Shizumasa Murata
Hiroshi Hashizume
Hiroshi Iwasaki
Andrew J. Schoenfeld
Hiroshi Taneichi
Hiroshi Yamada
Masanari Takami
Andrew K. Simpson
Munehito Yoshida
Yukihiro Nakagawa
Ryo Taiji
Motohiro Okada
Kimihide Murakami
Takuhei Kozaki
Akihito Minamide
Yasutsugu Yukawa
Shunji Tsutsui
Source :
Clinical spine surgery. 34(10)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to characterize the long-term clinical and radiographic results of articular segmental decompression surgery using endoscopy [cervical microendoscopic laminotomy (CMEL)] for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and to compare outcomes to conventional expansive laminoplasty (ELAP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The spinal cord compression in CSM consists of a pincer mechanism due to bulging disk and a hypertrophied ligamentum flavum. The long-term clinical benefits of segmental decompression surgery, which removes the dorsal compressive elements of articular segment in CSM patients, have not yet been elucidated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with CSM who required surgical treatment were enrolled. All enrolled patients (n=81) underwent CMEL or ELAP. All patients were followed postoperatively for >5 years. The preoperative and 5-year follow-up evaluation included neurological assessment [Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score], JOA recovery rates, axial neck pain (visual analog scale), and cervical sagittal alignment (C2-C7 subaxial cervical angle). RESULTS Sixty-four patients (CMEL group: 33, ELAP group: 31) were included for analysis. The preoperative JOA score was 10.1 points in the CMEL group and 11.1 points in the ELAP group (P=0.15). The JOA recovery rates were similar, 58.6% in the CMEL group and 55.2% in the ELAP group (P=0.55). The axial neck pain in the CMEL group was significantly lower than that in the ELAP group (P

Details

ISSN :
23800194
Volume :
34
Issue :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical spine surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....91eb83588c6db9db288e36895ec1adb0