Back to Search Start Over

A multicenter, randomized, and double-blind phase IV clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine orotate/valsartan 5/160 mg versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 160/12.5 mg in patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled by valsartan 160 mg monotherapy

Authors :
Sang Wook Lim
Kyoo Rok Han
Min Su Hyon
Sang Ho Jo
Nae Hee Lee
Kwang Soo Cha
Taehoon Ahn
Sang Wook Kim
Doo Il Kim
Kiyuk Chang
Yongcheol Kim
Weon Kim
Jun Kwan
Chi Young Shim
Youngkeun Ahn
Moo Yong Rhee
Sung Yun Lee
Source :
Medicine
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: To determine whether the effectiveness and safety of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of amlodipine orotate/valsartan (AML/VAL) 5/160 mg are noninferior to those of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (VAL/HCTZ) 160/12.5 mg in hypertensive patients with inadequate response to valsartan 160 mg monotherapy. Methods: This 8-week, active-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled, and noninferiority trial was conducted at 17 cardiovascular centers in the Republic of Korea. Eligible patients had mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) ≥90 mm Hg despite monotherapy with valsartan 160 mg for 4 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with AML/VAL 5/160 mg FDC (AML/VAL) group or VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg FDC (VAL/HCTZ) group once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 238 patients were enrolled (AML/VAL group, n = 121; VAL/HCTZ group, n = 117), of whom 228 completed the study. Results: At 8 weeks after randomization, msDBP was significantly decreased in both groups (−9.44 ± 0.69 mm Hg in the AML/VAL group and −7.47 ± 0.71 mm Hg in the VAL/HCTZ group, both P

Details

ISSN :
15365964
Volume :
97
Issue :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....91e9f3f9bac192a144bcab04e7c598e4