Back to Search Start Over

Evaluating the role of FAMIly history of cancer and diagnosis of multiple neoplasms in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. the multicenter FAMI-L1 study

Authors :
Fabiana Perrone
Rosa Rita Silva
Cristina Zannori
Paolo Marchetti
Francesco Atzori
Giampiero Porzio
Raffaele Giusti
Domenico Mallardo
Nicola Tinari
Enzo Veltri
Tea Zeppola
Federica De Galitiis
Marcello Tiseo
Alessio Cortellini
Cecilia Anesi
Claudia Mosillo
Alessandro Inno
Marianna Tudini
Stefania Gori
Alain Gelibter
Marco Filetti
Corrado Ficorella
Alessandra Tessitore
Melissa Bersanelli
Andrea Botticelli
Mario Occhipinti
Antonino Grassadonia
Marco Russano
Maria Giuseppa Vitale
Annagrazia Pireddu
Maria Concetta Fargnoli
Francesco Malorgio
Katia Cannita
Federica Pergolesi
Silvia Rinaldi
Michele De Tursi
Maria Rita Migliorino
Francesca Rastelli
Daniela Iacono
Gian Carlo Antonini Cappellini
Rossana Berardi
Pietro Di Marino
Alessandro Parisi
Sergio Bracarda
Paolo A. Ascierto
Daniele Santini
Sebastiano Buti
Federica Zoratto
Francesco Martella
Source :
OncoImmunology, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2020), Oncoimmunology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Taylor and Francis Inc., 2020.

Abstract

Background: We investigate the role of family history of cancer (FHC) and diagnosis of metachronous and/or synchronous multiple neoplasms (MN), during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Design: This was a multicenter retrospective study of advanced cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. FHC was collected in lineal and collateral lines, and patients were categorized as follows: FHC-high (in case of cancer diagnoses in both the lineal and collateral family lines), FHC-low (in case of cancer diagnoses in only one family line), and FHC-negative. Patients were also categorized according to the diagnosis of MN as follows: MN-high (>2 malignancies), MN-low (two malignancies), and MN-negative. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade were evaluated. Results: 822 consecutive patients were evaluated. 458 patients (55.7%) were FHC-negative, 289 (35.2%) were FHC-low, and 75 (9.1%) FHC-high, respectively. 29 (3.5%) had a diagnosis of synchronous MN and 94 (11.4%) of metachronous MN. 108 (13.2%) and 15 (1.8%) patients were MN-low and MN-high, respectively. The median follow-up was 15.6 months. No significant differences were found regarding ORR among subgroups. FHC-high patients had a significantly longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.48–0.97], p = .0379) and OS (HR = 0.61 [95% CI: 0.39–0.93], p = .0210), when compared to FHC-negative patients. FHC-high was confirmed as an independent predictor for PFS and OS at multivariate analysis. No significant differences were found according to MN categories. FHC-high patients had a significantly higher incidence of irAEs of any grade, compared to FHC-negative patients (p = .0012). Conclusions: FHC-high patients seem to benefit more than FHC-negative patients from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
OncoImmunology, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2020), Oncoimmunology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9188008c5ae13f2d4a77fcf81eb408dd