The Hydrothermal System of the Campi Flegrei Caldera, Italy

In this chapter, we review the state-of-the-art of the Campi Flegrei caldera (Naples) hydrothermal system, and its behaviour during the last decades. The Campi Flegrei caldera has been undergoing unrest since 1950, as evidenced by recurrent bradyseismic episodes accompanied by manifest changes in the degassing budget, degassing patterns and in the composition of the fumarolic fluids. In-depth analysis of geochemical and geophysical datasets acquired over decades has allowed identification of the mechanisms driving volcanic unrest at the Campi Flegrei caldera. We propose a conceptual model of the hydrothermal system feeding Solfatara fumaroles, where geochemical information is integrated with Audio Magneto Telluric measurements, which yields a realistic picture of the geometry of the system up to a depth of 2.5km. The model identifies a ~2km elongated vertical high resistivity structure in axis with the Solfatara fumaroles, which represents a relatively high permeability zone allowing hot fluid ascent from depth to the shallower portions of the hydrothermal system. Pulsed injections of hot magmatic fluids (CO2-rich and CH4-poor oxidised fluids) at the bottom of the hydrothermal system is thought to be one of the key processes that has controlled the evolution of the system during the last 40years. The episodes of injection of magmatic fluids changed in frequency and intensity during time, ultimately causing an overall heating and pressurisation of the system since the early 2000s, as reflected by escalating degassing flux, increase in areal extension of the degassing areas, and in the composition of the fumaroles. In particular, the CO2/CH4 and He/CH4 ratios of fumarolic fluids exhibited recurrent peaks, marking the episodes of injection of magmatic fluids. Moreover, the quasi-monotonic increasing trend of the fumarolic CO2/H2O ratio, from 0.15 to 0.18 in 2000 to ~0.4 in 2018–2019, has been interpreted as due to the combined action of partial steam condensation, and CO2 addition from a magmatic source and possibly from de-carbonation of hydrothermal calcite favoured by the heating of the hydrothermal reservoir. These changes strongly suggest that the ongoing (since 2000) unrest is triggered by a degassing magma source, but also that the system’s response is modulated by dynamics and structures of the overlying hydrothermal envelope. This evolution clearly requires careful scientific scrutiny and intensified monitoring in the years to come.