Back to Search Start Over

Influenza vaccination strategy in acute coronary syndromes: the VIP-ACS trial

Authors :
Henrique Andrade R Fonseca
Remo Holanda M Furtado
André Zimerman
Pedro A Lemos
Marcelo Franken
Frederico Monfardini
Rodrigo P Pedrosa
Rodrigo de Lemos S Patriota
Luiz Carlos S Passos
Frederico Toledo C Dall’Orto
Conrado R Hoffmann Filho
Bruno Ramos Nascimento
Felipe A Baldissera
Cesar Augusto C Pereira
Paulo Ricardo A Caramori
Pedro Beraldo de Andrade
Carlos Esteves
Elke Ferreira Salim
Jefferson Henrique da Silva
Izabela Chave Pedro
Mariana Castaldi R Silva
Ewerton Hernandes de Pedri
Ana Carla R D Carioca
Luciana Pereira A de Piano
Camila Santos N Albuquerque
Diogo D F Moia
Roberta Grazzielli R A P Momesso
Felipe P Machado
Lucas P Damiani
Ronaldo Vicente P Soares
Guilherme P Schettino
Luiz V Rizzo
José Carlos Nicolau
Otávio Berwanger
Source :
European Heart Journal. 43:4378-4388
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022.

Abstract

Aims To evaluate whether a strategy of double-dose influenza vaccination during hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with standard-dose outpatient vaccination (as recommended by current guidelines) would further reduce the risk of major cardiopulmonary events. Methods and results Vaccination against Influenza to Prevent cardiovascular events after Acute Coronary Syndromes (VIP-ACS) was a pragmatic, randomized, multicentre, active-comparator, open-label trial with blinded outcome adjudication comparing two strategies of influenza vaccination following an ACS: double-dose quadrivalent inactivated vaccine before hospital discharge vs. standard-dose quadrivalent inactivated vaccine administered in the outpatient setting 30 days after randomization. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for respiratory causes, analysed by the win ratio method. Patients were followed for 12 months. During two influenza seasons, 1801 participants were included at 25 centres in Brazil. The primary outcome was not different between groups, with 12.7% wins in-hospital double-dose vaccine group and 12.3% wins in the standard-dose vaccine group {win ratio: 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79–1.32], P = 0.84}. Results were consistent for the key secondary outcome, a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke [win ratio: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.66–1.33), P = 0.72]. Time-to-first event analysis for the primary outcome showed results similar to those of the main analysis [hazard ratio 0.97 (95% CI: 0.75–1.24), P = 0.79]. Adverse events were infrequent and did not differ between groups. Conclusion Among patients hospitalized with an ACS, double-dose influenza vaccination before discharge did not reduce cardiopulmonary outcomes compared with standard-dose vaccination in the outpatient setting. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04001504

Details

ISSN :
15229645 and 0195668X
Volume :
43
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Heart Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8fb27339375f14408e76d051f70ef735
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac472