Back to Search
Start Over
A randomized trial of intensive versus minimal surveillance of patients with resected Dukes B2-C colorectal carcinoma
- Source :
- Annals of Oncology. 27:274-280
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2016.
-
Abstract
- Background Colorectal cancer is the third most common and the third most lethal cancer in both men and women in developed countries. About 75% of cases are first diagnosed when the disease is classified as localized or regional, undergo potentially curative treatment and enter a post-treatment surveillance program. Although such programs drain significant resources from health systems, empirical evidence of their efficacy is scanty. Patients and methods Dukes B2-C colorectal cancer patients who had no evidence of disease at the end of their front-line treatment (surgery and adjuvant radiochemotherapy, if indicated) were eligible for the trial and randomized to two different surveillance programs. These programs differed greatly in the frequency of diagnostic imaging. They had similar schedules of physical examinations and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessments. Patients received baseline and yearly health-related quality-of-life (HR-QoL) questionnaires. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and QoL. Results From 1998 to 2006, 1228 assessable patients were randomized, 933 with colon cancer and 295 with rectal cancer. More than 90% of patients had the expected number of diagnostic procedures. Median follow-up duration was 62 months [interquartile range (IQR) 51–86] in the minimal surveillance group and 62 months (IQR 50–85) in the intensive group. At primary analysis, 250 patients had recurred and 218 had died. Intensive surveillance anticipated recurrence, as shown by a significant difference in mean disease-free survival of 5.9 months. Comparison of OS curves of the whole intention-to-treat population showed no statistically significant differences. HR-QoL of life scores did not differ between regimens. Conclusion Our findings support the conclusions of other randomized clinical trials, which show that early diagnosis of cancer recurrence is not associated with OS benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02409472.
- Subjects :
- Diagnostic Imaging
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Colorectal cancer
Population
Disease
Disease-Free Survival
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Carcinoembryonic antigen
Randomized controlled trial
Interquartile range
law
Surveys and Questionnaires
Internal medicine
Humans
Medicine
education
Early Detection of Cancer
education.field_of_study
biology
Rectal Neoplasms
business.industry
Cancer
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
Colonoscopy
Hematology
medicine.disease
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
Surgery
Patient Outcome Assessment
Treatment Outcome
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Colonic Neoplasms
Quality of Life
biology.protein
Female
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
business
Developed country
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 09237534
- Volume :
- 27
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Annals of Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8f77e62c1981e732e0e1b746c4e2b357
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv541